2008/7/25 Paul W. Frields [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Downstream should be free to choose what they like from upstream to
build their own toys.
This is a given. No one is saying people are not free to choose.
But generally, large changes in project direction, should also be
moments of reflection and
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 12:59:46PM -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
2008/7/25 Paul W. Frields [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Downstream should be free to choose what they like from upstream to
build their own toys.
This is a given. No one is saying people are not free to choose.
But generally, large
2008/7/27 Paul W. Frields [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The messages I've seen from Arjan imply that Moblin is going to do
this in their own way, and the messages I saw from Greg and Karsten
support that as well.
Until i see some sort of open discussion, even an archived one, as to
the goals for
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 10:49 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
2008/7/24 Paul W. Frields [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
* He didn't seem to be interested in Moblin as a feature of Fedora, per
se. He's happy to work as a downstream entirely.
I wasn't thinking Fedora 'feature' I was thinking more along the
2008/7/24 Paul W. Frields [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
* He didn't seem to be interested in Moblin as a feature of Fedora, per
se. He's happy to work as a downstream entirely.
I wasn't thinking Fedora 'feature' I was thinking more along the lines
of how OLPC is interacting with us..sort of...without
Hi,
Interesting move from Intel. Let's hope they start contributing to
Fedora more.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/07/23/moblin_reworked/
Digg It:
http://digg.com/linux_unix/Intel_s_Moblin_dumps_Ubuntu_in_favor_of_Fedora
Under the changes, the existing Ubuntu-based kernel is out and
