On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 00:15 -0800, Karsten Wade wrote:
> Remaining @ redhat.com for formal Fedora Web services is like having a
> Geocities website. OK, that's a little harsh. It just makes it appear
> that Fedora is forever a stepchild of Red Hat; has to live in the same
> house, but different l
> > 2. Move mailing lists to fedoraproject.org. Other than independence from
> > redhat.com, what does this buy us? What is this independence from
> > redhat.com worth? And is Seth even willing/able to maintain this?
>
> Seems this would just be a perception thing.
I agree with this statement.
On Sat, 2005-12-03 at 01:08 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 20:57 -0600, Patrick Barnes wrote:
> > My first instinct is to vote for #2. I like the long-term goal of the
> > Fedora Project becoming more autonomous and independent -- or at least
> > giving that appearance. I kno
Hi
- I think we should add "devel" to the name of these lists:
fedora-desktop-list
fedora-tools-list
fedora-config-list
No, this is not important, but it avoids confusion for the users. With
"devel" in the name it's obvious that this is for devel discussions.
Yes, there will still be people tha
Am Freitag, den 02.12.2005, 13:40 -0500 schrieb Greg DeKoenigsberg:
> We've got the following options to consider:
>
> 1. Continuing to host mailing lists at Red Hat. This is the easiest
> option, and considering that Red Hat sponsors lots of mailing lists, no
> big deal, really. We've got a
Hi
Is the perception that it ends in a redhat.com address? What if it were
lists.fedoraproject.org or something similar, but still ran on RH's
hardware? Just playing Devil's Advocate (:
Red Hat HW or bandwidth is just fine because it has low visibility
compared to a domain name unless it
Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-12-03 at 14:39 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
>> Perception is a huge factor in favor of it. Even when we let non
>> @redhat.com community people to administrate mailing lists, this is not
>> very visible. Adequate infrastructure and people behind
>> fedor
On Sat, 2005-12-03 at 14:39 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Perception is a huge factor in favor of it. Even when we let non
> @redhat.com community people to administrate mailing lists, this is not
> very visible. Adequate infrastructure and people behind
> fedoraproject.org is important to ens
Jesse Keating wrote:
On Sat, 2005-12-03 at 08:07 +0100, Gerold Kassube wrote:
also my vote for 2
Ok guys, this isn't a vote. This is a probe as to why you would want to
use one option over another. A blank vote doesn't help. A well thought
out reason would help a lot.
Why would yo
On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 20:57 -0600, Patrick Barnes wrote:
> My first instinct is to vote for #2. I like the long-term goal of the
> Fedora Project becoming more autonomous and independent -- or at least
> giving that appearance. I know it would take a great deal of effort to
> move everything over
On Sat, 2005-12-03 at 08:07 +0100, Gerold Kassube wrote:
>
> also my vote for 2
Ok guys, this isn't a vote. This is a probe as to why you would want to
use one option over another. A blank vote doesn't help. A well thought
out reason would help a lot.
Why would you want 2, what makes it the b
On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 13:40 -0500, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
> OK, so we need to come to a decision on how Fedora mailing lists will work
> as we grow, because we're starting to get requests from various folks to
> start them up.
>
> We've got the following options to consider:
>
> 1. Continuing
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Thomas Chung wrote:
> > On Fri, 2 Dec 2005 13:40:46 -0500 (EST), Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote
> >
> >>OK, so we need to come to a decision on how Fedora mailing lists will work
> >>as we grow, because we're starting to get requests from various fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Chung wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Dec 2005 13:40:46 -0500 (EST), Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote
>
>>OK, so we need to come to a decision on how Fedora mailing lists will work
>>as we grow, because we're starting to get requests from various folks to
>>start t
Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
> OK, so we need to come to a decision on how Fedora mailing lists will work
> as we grow, because we're starting to get requests from various folks to
> start them up.
>
> We've got the following options to consider:
>
> 1. Continuing to host mailing lists at Red Hat. Th
On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 11:09 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 13:40 -0500, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
> > 1. Continuing to host mailing lists at Red Hat. This is the easiest
> > option, and considering that Red Hat sponsors lots of mailing lists, no
> > big deal, really. We've
On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 13:40 -0500, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
> 1. Continuing to host mailing lists at Red Hat. This is the easiest
> option, and considering that Red Hat sponsors lots of mailing lists, no
> big deal, really. We've got a good infrastructure for getting them
> created relatively
I vote for #1. The infatructure is already in place, the overhead is
taken care of. I'm a fan of keeping it simple, and not fixing things
that aren't broken :) Changing the mailing list infastructure just for
nominal reasons seems pointless and will only serve to create more work
for others :)
Rega
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 01:40:46PM -0500, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
> OK, so we need to come to a decision on how Fedora mailing lists will work
> as we grow, because we're starting to get requests from various folks to
> start them up.
Just to clarify, do you see an actual problem (current or imp
I don't care as long as "authoritative" lists are archived in a
centralized place. Can I troll web-archives on multiple servers..yes I
can. Do I want to do that? Not if I can avoid it.
While I might not be particularly good at it, I do attempt to search
relevant list discussions before I jump into
On Fri, 2 Dec 2005 13:40:46 -0500 (EST), Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote
> OK, so we need to come to a decision on how Fedora mailing lists will work
> as we grow, because we're starting to get requests from various folks to
> start them up.
>
> We've got the following options to consider:
>
> 1. Contin
OK, so we need to come to a decision on how Fedora mailing lists will work
as we grow, because we're starting to get requests from various folks to
start them up.
We've got the following options to consider:
1. Continuing to host mailing lists at Red Hat. This is the easiest
option, and consid
22 matches
Mail list logo
