On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 08:00 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> At any rate, we need people to implement it.
Understand exactly where you are coming from. ;)
> Then there are two other related projects which might interest you.
> https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/LHCP/
> https://hosted.fedora
Bryan J. Smith wrote:
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 01:43 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
I did suggest something very similar at
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2007-March/msg00139.html
Apparently there isn't much traction to this idea.
I read through the thread and I didn't get t
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 01:43 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> I did suggest something very similar at
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2007-March/msg00139.html
> Apparently there isn't much traction to this idea.
I read through the thread and I didn't get that idea at all.
In
Robert M. Albrecht wrote:
Hi,
Agreed. It's a nice way of getting legal support for these things should the
user opt for them, while still keeping the Fedora as-is Free.
Perhaps this could be expanded in some way.
If Fedora finds any unsupported hardware it could display a dialog
informing th
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 22:53 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Jonathan Roberts wrote:
>
> >
> > Looks cool :D I was wondering about putting a link directly on the
> > home page perhaps?! Or is that outside of the plans for the homepage?
>
> I think so.
I can see pros and cons. If you want to purs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bryan J. Smith wrote:
[snipping a very large and very well written bit]
> Fedora advocates don't have to "bark back" to make a point. They just
> need to repeat, even like a broken record, "we product a 100%
> redistributable distribution with 0% in
On Sun, 2007-04-15 at 22:30 +0200, Robert M. Albrecht wrote:
> Perhaps this could be expanded in some way.
> If Fedora finds any unsupported hardware it could display a dialog
> informing the user:
> - device class and vendor
> - link to vendors homepage
> - vendors contact to click (thus launching
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 09:43 +0530, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote:
> I would tend to believe that is more the result of a tradeoff between
> convenience and sticking to a distribution's moral and/or ethical
> standpoint. For example, till the time Intel Graphics cards became the
> flavor of the mont
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 10:44 +0800, Marc Wiriadisastra wrote:
> I think we spread the word enough its just people choose not to listen.
> Without actually placing it on their desktop and making a user click 'I
> understand this contains no propietary software' I don't know what else
> needs to be do
Hi,
> Agreed. It's a nice way of getting legal support for these things should the
> user opt for them, while still keeping the Fedora as-is Free.
Perhaps this could be expanded in some way.
If Fedora finds any unsupported hardware it could display a dialog
informing the user:
- device class an
Karsten Wade wrote:
> Codec Buddy is a great step/improvement here. I like the idea of
> confronting the situation head-on, proactively. Pages on the Wiki and
> pointing at them after someone complains is reactive.
Agreed. It's a nice way of getting legal support for these things should the
user
Jonathan Roberts wrote:
Looks cool :D I was wondering about putting a link directly on the
home page perhaps?! Or is that outside of the plans for the homepage?
I think so.
Rahul
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing
On 12/04/07, Rahul Sundaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jonathan Roberts wrote:
>> Nope. What can we do for people? What can we offer them that is
>> useful?
>>
>> * More original content in Ogg format
>
> There's already *loads* of original content in Ogg, maybe Fedora could
> point them in the
Jonathan Roberts wrote:
Nope. What can we do for people? What can we offer them that is
useful?
* More original content in Ogg format
There's already *loads* of original content in Ogg, maybe Fedora could
point them in the direction of some of it? Magnatune, Jamendo etc...I
thought the new d
2007/4/12, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Karsten Wade wrote:
> In the article referenced below there is an (implied) call to action for
> Fedora:
>
> "One might well wonder why certain Fedora users feel the need to repeat
> these comp
Nope. What can we do for people? What can we offer them that is
useful?
* More original content in Ogg format
There's already *loads* of original content in Ogg, maybe Fedora could
point them in the direction of some of it? Magnatune, Jamendo etc...I
thought the new default home page in FC6 w
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 10:44 +0800, Marc Wiriadisastra wrote:
> I think we spread the word enough its just people choose not to listen.
> Without actually placing it on their desktop and making a user click 'I
> understand this contains no propietary software' I don't know what else
> needs to be d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Karsten Wade wrote:
> In the article referenced below there is an (implied) call to action for
> Fedora:
>
> "One might well wonder why certain Fedora users feel the need to repeat
> these complaints so often. Perhaps the project is not doing an adequ
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 10:44:13AM +0800, Marc Wiriadisastra wrote:
> I think we spread the word enough its just people choose not to listen.
> Without actually placing it on their desktop and making a user click 'I
> understand this contains no propietary software' I don't know what else
> needs t
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 19:23 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote:
> In the article referenced below there is an (implied) call to action for
> Fedora:
>
> "One might well wonder why certain Fedora users feel the need to repeat
> these complaints so often. Perhaps the project is not doing an adequate
> job of
In the article referenced below there is an (implied) call to action for
Fedora:
"One might well wonder why certain Fedora users feel the need to repeat
these complaints so often. Perhaps the project is not doing an adequate
job of communicating what it is trying to do. One assumes that, if
people
21 matches
Mail list logo
