On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 12:44 -0700, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 01:35 +0200, Christian Iseli wrote:
Owners stats:
- 6517 packages
- 10799 binary rpms in devel
Darn, I was afraid of that. We are all perfectly aware that one package
(tarball + spec file) can
And I think some of the binaries may be repeated for certain arches,
right? But to me, saying 10,000 isn't disingenuous. It's simple
and
effective and essentially truthful. And it's what users can get,
which
is the central issue.
How does our terminology compare to other distributions?
2008/8/19 Karsten 'quaid' Wade [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Owners stats:
- 6517 packages
- 10799 binary rpms in devel
Darn, I was afraid of that. We are all perfectly aware that one package
(tarball + spec file) can yield more than one binary rpm.
Would it be better to consistently start using a
On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 01:35 +0200, Christian Iseli wrote:
Owners stats:
- 6517 packages
- 10799 binary rpms in devel
Darn, I was afraid of that. We are all perfectly aware that one package
(tarball + spec file) can yield more than one binary rpm.
So what are we counting when we count in
