One of the annoying things about running qjackctl on a fresh Fedora
install is that you have to remember to edit /etc/security/limits.conf
as per /usr/share/doc/jack-audio-connection-kit-0.102.20/README.Fedora
or else it doesn't work at all. I'm wondering if there's something we
can do to make thi
Anthony Green wrote:
One of the annoying things about running qjackctl on a fresh Fedora
install is that you have to remember to edit /etc/security/limits.conf
as per /usr/share/doc/jack-audio-connection-kit-0.102.20/README.Fedora
or else it doesn't work at all. I'm wondering if there's somethin
On Sun, 2007-01-07 at 11:14 -0800, Florin Andrei wrote:
> I was about to say "just let the install scripts do the change in the
> background, without asking, and be done with it" but then I remembered
> you have to specify the user name(s).
>
> So, yeah, good idea, no doubt. Just make sure to di
On Sun, 2007-01-07 at 06:27 -0800, Anthony Green wrote:
> I just can't imagine how a new user gets anything running without
> stumbling upon that README.Fedora file or searching for help on the web.
>
> Good idea? Bad idea? Suggestions?
We really need to put together a decent "How to get starte
On Sun, 2007-01-07 at 15:09 -0600, Callum Lerwick wrote:
> Has jack's README.Fedora been changed to recommend a memlock of 131072
> (128mb) or so? 5 is really not enough.
No, I don't think so. File a bug I guess.
> Not sure how we can do out-of-the-box setup that will be acceptable
> distri
Anthony Green wrote:
Oh, I like this idea. So the jack-audio-connection-kit %post would
create a jackuser group, and add the following to limits.conf...
@jackuser - rtprio 20
@jackuser - memlock 131072
Then we could still have a wrapper around qjackctl to see if the user is
a member of the ja
On Sun, 2007-01-07 at 15:06 -0800, Florin Andrei wrote:
> > Does that sound right?
>
> Perfect.
I've filed a bug for adding the jackuser group...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221785
AG
___
Fedora-music-list mailing list
Fedor
