"I'm interested to hear any test cases you guys may have that justify why
you need -rt. "
every.single.time.
without rt, the packages I use are virtually useless. performance sucks.
with rt, a world of good.
it always amazed me that redhat never let Fedora into their 'real-time'
kernel plans. w
On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 02:49 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > Since there seems much demand for this I've just pushed a build of
> > ardour-2.4
> > to the F-8 updates-testing repo (it will show up there with the next update
> > of
> > the update repositories). Please give this a thorough
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 21:52 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 16:03 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >> ZC Miao wrote:
> >>> [quote]
> >>> Ardour 2.4 released
> >>> Submitted by paul on Mon, 2008-03-31 21:03. :: Articles
> >>> Well, its over a month
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 21:52 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 16:03 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
ZC Miao wrote:
[quote]
Ardour 2.4 released
Submitted by paul on Mon, 2008-03-31 21:03. :: Articles
Well, its over a month
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 02:49 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
Since there seems much demand for this I've just pushed a build of ardour-2.4
to the F-8 updates-testing repo (it will show up there with the next update of
the update repositories). Please give this
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 03:50 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> Do we want Fedora/Music to be rock stable? Or do we want a fast moving
> music environment that keeps up to the latest and greatest? The later
> would seem more "in tune" with Fedora itself and is what I used to do on
> Planet CCRM
