Hi,
Now that Ardour 2.0 has been released, will it be in the repository for
FC7?
BTW: is there a list of available packages in FC7 somewhere?
Thanks
--
Per Thomas
___
Fedora-music-list mailing list
Fedora-music-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 08:53 +0200, Per Thomas Jahr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Now that Ardour 2.0 has been released, will it be in the repository for
> FC7?
It would be nice to get Rosegarden upgraded to version 1.5.1 as well.
Keith.
___
Fedora-music-list mai
Keith Sharp wrote:
It would be nice to get Rosegarden upgraded to version 1.5.1 as well.
The best way to get the maintainer's attention is to file a bug report
at http://bugzilla.redhat.com.
AG
begin:vcard
fn:Anthony Green
n:Green;Anthony
org:Red Hat, Inc.
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
te
Per Thomas Jahr wrote:
Hi,
Now that Ardour 2.0 has been released, will it be in the repository for
FC7?
Yes, I just started working on this for F7.
BTW: is there a list of available packages in FC7 somewhere?
Just poke around here...
http://redhat.download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/l
Per Thomas Jahr wrote:
Hi,
Now that Ardour 2.0 has been released, will it be in the repository for
FC7?
This new version of ardour installs as /usr/bin/ardour2 (/etc/ardour2,
etc), so you can install it in parallel with the old ardour. However,
it's also fully backwards compatible with th
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 08:07 -0700, Anthony Green wrote:
> Per Thomas Jahr wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Now that Ardour 2.0 has been released, will it be in the repository for
> > FC7?
>
> This new version of ardour installs as /usr/bin/ardour2 (/etc/ardour2,
> etc), so you can install it in parallel
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 07:17 -0700, Anthony Green wrote:
> Per Thomas Jahr wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Now that Ardour 2.0 has been released, will it be in the repository for
> > FC7?
>
> Yes, I just started working on this for F7.
Excellent!
> > BTW: is there a list of available packages in FC7 so
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
If we keep the "ardour" package name in Extras and transition that
package to 2.x, how can Planet CCRMA be compatible with that? I can't do
anything on my side, I think (the ardour2 packages have been out there
for a while and are installed in machines all over the p
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 13:32 -0700, Anthony Green wrote:
> Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > If we keep the "ardour" package name in Extras and transition that
> > package to 2.x, how can Planet CCRMA be compatible with that? I can't do
> > anything on my side, I think (the ardour2 packages have bee
