Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 23:32 -0800, Anthony Green wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
I think it would be best to put the real ardour binary under
/usr/libexec and put a bash script called ardour under /usr/bin, this
script could then check for an ~/.ardour2/ardour
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 23:32 -0800, Anthony Green wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
I think it would be best to put the real ardour binary under
/usr/libexec and put a bash script called ardour under /usr/bin, this
script could then check for an ~/.ardour2/ardourver2.2 f
On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 23:32 -0800, Anthony Green wrote:
Ok, I've kicked off a devel build of ardour 2.2 with the changes you
described. It should show up in rawhide soon (assuming the build
completes). Please have a look if you can. If it looks good, then I'll
probably push it out to F8 as w
On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 23:32 -0800, Anthony Green wrote:
> Hans de Goede wrote:
> > I think it would be best to put the real ardour binary under
> > /usr/libexec and put a bash script called ardour under /usr/bin, this
> > script could then check for an ~/.ardour2/ardourver2.2 file, and if
> > th
Hans de Goede wrote:
I think it would be best to put the real ardour binary under
/usr/libexec and put a bash script called ardour under /usr/bin, this
script could then check for an ~/.ardour2/ardourver2.2 file, and if
that not exits remove the 3 files mentioned above (if they exist, or
use r
Anthony Green wrote:
I was looking at upgrading ardour to 2.2 for f8 and devel when I came
across the following note:
Important note for upgrading from 2.1 or earlier
Please note that for several of the new features and fixes listed below,
it is necessary to remove or update the following
I was looking at upgrading ardour to 2.2 for f8 and devel when I came
across the following note:
Important note for upgrading from 2.1 or earlier
Please note that for several of the new features and fixes listed below,
it is necessary to remove or update the following files if you have the
