[Fedora-music-list] bug #201647 - inclusion of alsa-oss in Fedora Core

2006-08-07 Thread Florin Andrei
My opinion is that aoss (a.k.a. the alsa-oss package) should be included in Core. I filed a report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201647 The discussion on LAU that triggered the report: http://music.columbia.edu/pipermail/linux-audio-user/2006-August/thread.html#37626 --

Re: [Fedora-music-list] bug #201647 - inclusion of alsa-oss in Fedora Core

2006-08-07 Thread Callum Lerwick
On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 15:17 -0700, Florin Andrei wrote: > My opinion is that aoss (a.k.a. the alsa-oss package) should be included > in Core. I filed a report: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201647 > > The discussion on LAU that triggered the report: > > http://music.co

Re: [Fedora-music-list] bug #201647 - inclusion of alsa-oss in Fedora Core

2006-08-08 Thread Bill Nottingham
Callum Lerwick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > Actually, something I'm pushing for in FC7, is to cut out the last > vestiges of OSS, Namely, by cutting out esound and while we're at it, > arts as well. > > I would rather alsa-oss did not go into core. Extras, sure. > > The flash plugin is pretty muc

Re: [Fedora-music-list] bug #201647 - inclusion of alsa-oss in Fedora Core

2006-08-09 Thread Per Thomas Jahr
tir, 08,.08.2006 kl. 00.47 -0500, skrev Callum Lerwick: > The flash plugin is pretty much the only remaining OSS-only holdout. And > that will probably never change until we force their hand. From: http://blogs.adobe.com/penguin.swf/2006/07/api_review.html Audio I/O: ALSA -- Per Thomas