Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
Jussi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
--- Comment #50 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-10-29 09:27:50 EDT
---
bug #531773
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redha
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
Thomas Spura changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
--- Comment #48 from Julian Aloofi 2009-07-31
06:29:55 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #47)
> (In reply to comment #46)
> > I
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
--- Comment #47 from Konstantin Dmitriev 2009-07-31
00:01:53 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #46)
> Is this supposed to be?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
Julian Aloofi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
--- Comment #45 from Konstantin Dmitriev 2009-07-08
11:24:34 EDT ---
Forgot to mention that we are using synfig/synfigstud
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
--- Comment #44 from Konstantin Dmitriev 2009-07-08
11:16:09 EDT ---
> Anyway, isn't the "doesn't work on x86_64 at all" i
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
--- Comment #43 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-07 11:52:17
EDT ---
Failure of the submitter (Marc Wiriadisastra) to respond t
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
Lubomir Rintel changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
Lubomir Rintel changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
Konstantin Dmitryev changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
--- Comment #38 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-23 14:17:21
EDT ---
Is anything happening with this package? Any progress on
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
--- Comment #37 from Kamil Pawlowski 2009-03-19 15:14:22
EDT ---
Yes, this is x86_64 specific problem, now I use i386 comp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
--- Comment #36 from Muayyad Alsadi 2009-03-19 14:34:44 EDT
---
> 1.) Please, no more backtraces of crashes. (Thanks for t
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
--- Comment #34 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-03-19 06:46:34 EDT
---
A few comments and a new package:
1.) Please, no more bac
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
--- Comment #33 from Kamil Pawlowski 2009-03-03 09:27:22
EDT ---
I have the same problem if I try build synfig from spec o
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
Kamil Pawlowski changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
Bug 428568 depends on bug 428567, which changed state.
Bug 428567 Summary: Review Request: ETL - Extended Template Library
http
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
--- Comment #31 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-02-26
12:10:38 EDT ---
any news ?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
--- Comment #30 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-02-05
13:06:52 EDT ---
well, okay the spec file itself it beautiful.
B
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
--- Comment #29 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-02-05 12:45:55 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #28)
> Created an attachment (id=3308
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
--- Comment #28 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-02-04
04:51:10 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=330847)
--> (https:/
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
--- Comment #27 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-02-04 02:16:07 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #26)
> New package (addresses just th
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
--- Comment #26 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-02-04 02:12:49 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #23)
> this package defines rpath on
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
--- Comment #25 from Muayyad Alsadi 2009-02-03 17:21:20 EDT
---
same problem, please see my traceback
the files are render
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
--- Comment #24 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-02-03
16:30:03 EDT ---
while compiling synfigstudio, it failed at this
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
--- Comment #23 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-02-03
15:47:24 EDT ---
this package defines rpath on x86_64 Fedora 10
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
--- Comment #22 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-01-30 02:54:29 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #21)
> I suggest to add Require: libx
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
--- Comment #21 from Lorenzo Villani 2009-01-16
13:04:35 EDT ---
I suggest to add Require: libxml++-devel to synfig-devel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
Lubomir Rintel changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
--- Comment #20 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-01-10 12:27:46 EDT
---
New upstream release (stepping in since the original submi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
--- Comment #19 from Muayyad Alsadi 2008-12-26 09:13:00 EDT
---
BTW: there are .src.rpm in http://zelgadis.profusehost.net
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
Muayyad Alsadi changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
--- Comment #17 from Muayyad Alsadi 2008-12-26 09:07:42 EDT
---
Created an attachment (id=327855)
--> (https://bugzilla.r
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
--- Comment #16 from Muayyad Alsadi 2008-12-26 09:06:40 EDT
---
Created an attachment (id=327854)
--> (https://bugzilla.r
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
--- Comment #15 from Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-23 01:20:34 EDT ---
New version released, please update. If there
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
--- Comment #14 from Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-02 00:24:54 EDT ---
We plan to make a release of 0.61.09 at the s
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
--- Comment #13 from Marc Wiriadisastra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-26
06:25:47 EDT ---
Take it over if you want
--
Confi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
Lorenzo Villani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
--- Additional Comments From [EMA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
--- Additional Comments From [EMA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
--- Additional Comments From [EMA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
--- Additional Comments From [EMA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
--- Additional Comments From [EMA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
--- Additional Comments From [EMA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
--- Additional Comments From [EMA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
--- Additional Comments From [EMA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
W
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
W
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
W
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
--- Additional Comments From [EMA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
--- Additional Comments From [EMA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
--- Additional Comments From [EMA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
W
57 matches
Mail list logo
