Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
Thomas Spura changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
--- Comment #37 from Thomas Spura 2009-07-29
15:54:49 EDT ---
Continuing the mess ;-)
I've started from scratch and compl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
--- Comment #35 from Kostas Georgiou 2009-06-15
08:24:30 EDT ---
sorry I was wrong root uses freetype but not fontconfig,
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
--- Comment #34 from Kostas Georgiou 2009-06-15
07:48:27 EDT ---
The software does use fontconfig so the X side is OK AFAI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
Nicolas Mailhot changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
--- Comment #32 from Thomas Spura 2009-06-12
13:06:16 EDT ---
ATM I have some troubles to compile even with the original .
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
--- Comment #31 from Thomas Spura 2009-06-12
10:41:50 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #30)
> Thomas this spec doesn't have an
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
--- Comment #30 from Kostas Georgiou 2009-06-12
09:20:34 EDT ---
Thomas this spec doesn't have any -devel -libs etc. subpa
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
--- Comment #29 from Thomas Spura 2009-06-12
07:33:20 EDT ---
I emailed Christian Holm Christensen for changing some parts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
--- Comment #28 from Suvayu 2009-06-11 23:33:09 EDT ---
Hi,
I have been following this bug but I have no experience in pac
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
--- Comment #27 from Thomas Spura 2009-06-11
09:04:21 EDT ---
I'm not yet that familiar with creating SPECs, but am free t
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
--- Comment #26 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-10
16:55:43 EDT ---
May I ask: Who is working on this package? juanucleu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
Jussi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
--- Comment #25 from Mattias Ellert 2009-05-25
22:40:51 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> The root configure file lists
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
--- Comment #24 from Thomas Spura 2009-05-12
19:32:15 EDT ---
Any update on this?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
--- Comment #23 from Joseph Smidt 2009-03-21 18:23:50
EDT ---
> At some point I found the place where the fonts are calle
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
--- Comment #22 from Thomas Spura 2009-03-21
16:25:45 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> So true type fonts are not allow
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
--- Comment #21 from juanucl...@gmail.com 2009-03-21
14:40:42 EDT ---
Hi,
So true type fonts are not allowed at all, or j
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
--- Comment #20 from Thomas Spura 2009-03-21
14:12:23 EDT ---
I'm giving up for now...
This is my fist try to create a .s
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
--- Comment #19 from Thomas Spura 2009-03-21
13:22:35 EDT ---
Hi,
I just asked on fedora-legal-list about the licence of
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
Mattias Ellert changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
--- Comment #17 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-03-09
11:45:58 EDT ---
After I have got a rpmls to the main package, I have found
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
Jochen Schmitt changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
Terje Røsten changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
--- Comment #14 from Joseph Smidt 2009-02-16
21:17:02 EDT ---
Request for comment: I know this package is not ready to re
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
Joseph Smidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
Joseph Smidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
--- Comment #13 from Joseph Smidt 2009-02-16 13:19:24
EDT ---
Thanks a lot for that .spec file. I will go back to work an
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
--- Comment #12 from Kostas Georgiou 2009-02-16
10:51:18 EDT ---
Here is the one that I used http://georgiou.fedorapeople.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
--- Comment #11 from Joseph Smidt 2009-02-15 15:09:01
EDT ---
Hello,
Just as an update, I have been trying to packag
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
--- Comment #10 from Kostas Georgiou 2009-02-12
08:12:24 EDT ---
I have a spec file that I use locally (we are an HEP grou
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
--- Comment #9 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-01-31
01:07:31 EDT ---
Joseph, please go ahead. If the initial submitter ret
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
Joseph Smidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
--- Comment #7 from Patrice Dumas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-03 18:22:55 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I don't have
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
Orcan Ogetbil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
Itamar Reis Peixoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-04 14:26:52
EDT ---
Hi Patrice and Axel,
Sorry for the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy
physics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy
physics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
--- Additional Comments From
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy
physics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy
physics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
--- Additional Comments From
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy
physics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
--- Additional Comments From
45 matches
Mail list logo
