[Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors

2008-10-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 Jochen Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors

2008-10-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 Jochen Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors

2008-10-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 --- Comment #26 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-07 13:30:24 EDT --- Note that all packages will get a F-10

[Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors

2008-10-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 --- Comment #24 from Jochen Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-06 05:02:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) I'm curious to

[Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors

2008-10-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 Jochen Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors

2008-10-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors

2008-10-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 --- Comment #17 from Aidan Delaney [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-02 06:26:00 EDT --- @Robert Scheck: I cannot replicate this

[Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors

2008-10-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 --- Comment #18 from Jochen Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-02 07:24:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) I think, you

[Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors

2008-10-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 Robert Scheck [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors

2008-10-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 Jochen Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors

2008-10-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 --- Comment #20 from Jochen Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-02 11:58:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) APPROVED

[Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors

2008-10-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 --- Comment #22 from Chitlesh GOORAH [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-02 12:26:36 EDT --- Hello Jochen, I'm curious to know why

[Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors

2008-10-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 --- Comment #15 from Jan Kratochvil [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-01 14:02:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) (In reply to

[Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors

2008-10-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 --- Comment #16 from Robert Scheck [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-01 14:53:32 EDT --- I think, you need some kind of

[Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors

2008-10-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 Bill Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors

2008-09-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 --- Comment #13 from Aidan Delaney [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-30 09:13:14 EDT --- Updated version is here:

[Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors

2008-09-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 --- Comment #14 from Jochen Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-30 09:55:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) Without some

[Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors

2008-09-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 --- Comment #11 from Jochen Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-29 12:29:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) Jochen: Do you

[Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors

2008-09-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 --- Comment #12 from Jan Kratochvil [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-29 13:04:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) A

[Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors

2008-09-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 --- Comment #10 from Aidan Delaney [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-28 17:27:06 EDT --- Jan, A spu-binutils.spec based on your

[Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors

2008-09-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 --- Comment #8 from Aidan Delaney [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-25 04:27:07 EDT --- Jan, Do you mean to (a) define a new

[Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors

2008-09-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 --- Comment #9 from Jan Kratochvil [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-25 21:49:05 EDT --- I was discussing (a) as a possibility but

[Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors

2008-09-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 --- Comment #7 from Jan Kratochvil [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-22 11:43:52 EDT --- Please note Rawhide binutils now supports

[Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors

2008-09-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 --- Comment #6 from Jochen Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-10 11:36:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) Following the

[Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors

2008-08-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 --- Comment #5 from Aidan Delaney [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-30 05:29:41 EDT --- I should have said Internationalisation

[Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors

2008-08-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 --- Comment #4 from Aidan Delaney [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-30 05:26:12 EDT --- This is my first package review. I've

[Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors

2008-08-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 --- Comment #3 from Jochen Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-28 11:28:02 EDT --- Is there anyone on CC who can help us with

[Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors

2008-07-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 --- Additional Comments

[Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors

2008-06-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: