Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
zhihe...@hotmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #96 from Scott Williams 2009-12-25 01:29:41
EDT ---
my best guess as to why it would work for one and not the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #95 from Andreas Petzold 2009-12-24
13:07:19 EDT ---
David, I'm aware of your great effort over the last 1.5 y
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #94 from David Halik 2009-12-23 12:36:41
EDT ---
1.4.3 is on it's way to being released, so I'm going to wait
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
Andreas Petzold changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #92 from Scott Williams 2009-12-22 17:18:27
EDT ---
For what it's worth, songbird 1.4 appears to work in f12 b
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #91 from Scott Williams 2009-12-22 16:56:44
EDT ---
Looks like 1.4 source is available:
http://publicsvn.songb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #90 from David Halik 2009-12-22 13:59:48
EDT ---
The source ball hasn't been released yet. When it is I'll sta
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #89 from Sebastian Krämer 2009-12-22 13:55:21
EDT ---
1.4 release?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.re
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
Dean Mander changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
Joel changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #86 from Scott Williams 2009-10-01 13:30:53
EDT ---
I regressed to 1.1.2 with the same plugin set and it's wor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #85 from David Halik 2009-10-01 12:59:42
EDT ---
That looks like an issue with whatever gst plugins you're usi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #84 from Scott Williams 2009-10-01 12:51:01
EDT ---
With the RPM you've provided for 1.2.0-1, any playback cau
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #83 from David Halik 2009-09-18 10:59:05
EDT ---
The only place ORIGIN is used is within the xulrunner package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #82 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-09-17
18:29:42 EDT ---
Any NEWS from the SongBird Legals (and improvem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #81 from Matej Cepl 2009-07-18 05:51:38 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #76)
> Building in mock for F-11...
> http
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #80 from Matej Cepl 2009-07-18 05:43:14 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #79)
> One thing I would like to recommend
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
Scott Williams changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #78 from David Halik 2009-07-14 07:35:31
EDT ---
I've been testing the last couple of release on x86_64 F11 an
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #77 from Jakub Hrozek 2009-07-14 04:15:49 EDT
---
FWIW, while the package Nicolas built installs fine, it segf
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #76 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-07-07
04:30:52 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #73)
> Can anyone give me
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #75 from David Halik 2009-06-23 16:42:03
EDT ---
Thanks for the link, but most of what is in there I was alrea
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #74 from Matej Cepl 2009-06-22 17:28:51 EDT ---
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Schedule/RpathCheckBuildsy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #73 from David Halik 2009-06-22 12:45:54
EDT ---
Can anyone give me some pointers on how to scrub the extra $O
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #72 from David Halik 2009-06-15 12:23:28
EDT ---
1.2 is due out shortly. I'll remove the $ORIGIN rpath in the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #71 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-06-14
11:40:36 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #70)
> Tried to rebuild ht
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #70 from Matej Cepl 2009-06-14 06:42:20 EDT ---
Tried to rebuild http://rpm.rutgers.edu/fedora/songbird-1.1.2-2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #68 from Stephen Lau 2009-06-10 15:05:13
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #66)
> (In reply to comment #65)
> > stu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #69 from Stephen Lau 2009-06-10 15:07:20
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #67) ...
Hey Tom,
Thanks very much for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #66 from Matej Cepl 2009-06-05 05:35:51 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #65)
> stuff just for Linux since it's ent
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #65 from Stephen Lau 2009-06-04 19:58:25
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #64)
> In my opinion, there is a problem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #64 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-05-07
12:22:34 EDT ---
songbird once first install wants to install fo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #63 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-05-07
08:57:30 EDT ---
About $ORIGIN, quoting songbird run script:
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #62 from David Halik 2009-05-04 09:50:57
EDT ---
Any recent thoughts kwizart? Haven't heard any updates from y
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #61 from David Halik 2009-04-18 12:04:13
EDT ---
Ok, I reworked the files section and all of the rpmlint perm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #60 from Jasper Capel 2009-04-17
13:15:15 EDT ---
My apologies, it builds just fine. :)
It's a mystery to me w
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #59 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-04-17
11:18:17 EDT ---
rpmlint on rpm package (not installed) built fo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #58 from Jasper Capel 2009-04-17
10:58:52 EDT ---
This was the only build, on a rawhide machine and rawhide bu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #57 from David Halik 2009-04-17 10:29:08
EDT ---
The build should only take 20-30 minutes. Have you tried mult
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #56 from Jasper Capel 2009-04-17
09:46:29 EDT ---
I've tried building the source rpm in mock on my machine. Ho
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #55 from David Halik 2009-04-14 21:51:52
EDT ---
Thanks stevel.
1.1.2 src.rpm and spec:
http://rpm.rutgers.e
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #54 from Stephen Lau 2009-04-14 17:55:10
EDT ---
1.1.2 source tarballs are up now:
http://wiki.songbirdnest.co
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #53 from David Halik 2009-04-14 14:55:19
EDT ---
1.1.2 source tar balls haven't been released yet, but as soon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #52 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-04-10
21:08:23 EDT ---
I won't be able to test during the week-end, so
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #51 from David Halik 2009-04-07 16:42:47
EDT ---
The buffer overflow is patched.
src.rpm and spec have been u
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #50 from David Halik 2009-04-07 12:46:51
EDT ---
For tracking the buffer overflow with RPM_OPT_FLAGS:
http:/
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #49 from David Halik 2009-04-07 11:09:05
EDT ---
FYI, host_ifparser.c is just an example of the compile option
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #48 from Rex Dieter 2009-04-07 10:50:34 EDT
---
More than likely, the stricter RPM_OPT_FLAGS are simply exposi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #47 from David Halik 2009-04-07 10:35:05
EDT ---
kwizart:
Forcing the RPM_OPT_FLAGS is the cause for the buff
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #46 from David Halik 2009-04-06 20:05:45
EDT ---
@kwizart:
Ok, I think I made all the changes you requested.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #45 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-04-06
05:53:43 EDT ---
Okay, so we are focusing on F-11 for now, once
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #44 from David Halik 2009-04-04 10:50:03
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #42)
> @David
> Please work with the gst
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #43 from Peter Robinson 2009-04-04 05:15:12
EDT ---
> quoting from SB #15401
> > I don't think the Fedora peep
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #42 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-04-04
04:42:19 EDT ---
@David
Please work with the gstreamer maintaine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #41 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-03-28 13:26:59
EDT ---
You can then branch only for Fedora 11 and meanwhile work
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
Rahul Sundaram changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #40 from Stephen Lau 2009-03-28 12:43:00
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #39)
> Why are those gstreamer patches n
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #38 from David Halik 2009-03-24 14:49:15
EDT ---
Good news and bad news.
The good news is that both the above
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #37 from Stephen Lau 2009-03-21 18:26:08
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #35)
> Yes, I am aware of this and anoth
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #35 from David Halik 2009-03-19 07:07:19
EDT ---
Yes, I am aware of this and another bug. Please see the follo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #34 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-03-19
06:44:01 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #33)
> The latest RPM pack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #33 from Vladimir Kotal 2009-03-19 06:02:25 EDT
---
The latest RPM package (1.1.1 on i386) suffers from a hang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #32 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-03-16
16:28:48 EDT ---
Build failed on F-10
http://koji.fedoraproject.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #31 from David Halik 2009-03-13 13:36:14
EDT ---
Here is the latest spec and srpm built against F11. There are
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #30 from David Halik 2009-03-12 15:28:46
EDT ---
Songbird 1.1.1 stable is now out and the srpm has been updat
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #29 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-03-02
08:53:56 EDT ---
Well, since there is a 1.1 beta2 release two da
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #28 from David Halik 2009-02-13 16:46:24
EDT ---
Based off of the method used in the Thunderbird package, the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #27 from David Halik 2009-02-12 17:30:10
EDT ---
@Nikolay
I looked into the symlinking issue. There was a bug
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #26 from David Halik 2009-02-02 13:33:47
EDT ---
@kwizart
Thanks for the help. I'm looking at some of the sug
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #25 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-02-02
06:04:56 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> > 1) Is anyone goin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #24 from Peter Robinson 2009-02-01 02:44:56
EDT ---
> 1) Is anyone going to make a full review for this + spon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #23 from Nikolay Vladimirov 2009-01-31
16:08:29 EDT ---
Several things:
1) Is anyone going to make a full rev
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #22 from David Halik 2009-01-30 10:11:16
EDT ---
My mistake. I forgot to log in and update the ticket after th
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #21 from Stephen Lau 2009-01-30 09:31:57
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> Hi!
>
> What is the status of th
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #19 from Stephen Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-12-08 14:03:48 EDT
---
We have patches to taglib for writing back
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #18 from Peter Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-12-08 13:59:19
EDT ---
The upstream songbird tracking bug is 3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #17 from David Halik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-12-08 13:04:58 EDT
---
Exactly. In Fedora, the only packages that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #16 from Stephen Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-12-08 11:59:49 EDT
---
It should build fine with a distribution G
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #15 from Peter Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-12-08 11:49:18
EDT ---
What is the status of being about to bu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #14 from David Halik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-12-08 11:44:13 EDT
---
In keeping with the Songbird release of 1.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
Itamar Reis Peixoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #13 from Peter Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-30 09:44:24
EDT ---
Songbird now has a tracking bug in upst
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #12 from David Halik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-26 22:04:39 EDT
---
In keeping with the Songbird release of 0.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #11 from Peter Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-13 04:25:22
EDT ---
I would suggest sending an email to the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #10 from Stephen Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-12 19:26:39 EDT
---
A bunch of us from various XULRunner proje
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Comment #9 from Peter Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-11 07:46:06 EDT
---
I've looked at building this in the past
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Remo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Remo
99 matches
Mail list logo