[Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family

2009-01-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Roozbeh Pournader changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family

2009-01-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #21 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-01-29 23:59:33 EDT --- I used the general name because there are families named '

[Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family

2009-01-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #22 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-30 01:39:48 EDT --- If you look at rawhide you'll see it's perfectly possible

[Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #23 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-30 03:32:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > (or sil-gentium-book-ba

[Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #24 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-01-30 06:39:58 EDT --- Ok. I have changed the naming. The new spec and srpm are a

[Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family

2009-02-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Rahul Bhalerao changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family

2009-02-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family

2009-02-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #26 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-02 18:42:30 EDT --- 1. you have a typo in you -common description 2. \ after

[Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family

2009-02-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family

2009-02-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Rahul Bhalerao changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family

2009-03-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Felix Schwarz changed: What|Removed |Added