Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
Bug 468516 depends on bug 478759, which changed state.
Bug 478759 Summary: Review Request: perl-SystemPerl - SystemPerl Perl mo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #36 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-07-05 08:19:11
EDT ---
- MUST: The package is named according to the Package Nam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
Chitlesh GOORAH changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #37 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-07-10 22:38:41
EDT ---
Ping ?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.co
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #38 from Lane 2009-07-10 23:13:06 EDT ---
Who are you pinging? What are the next steps? Is the procedure docum
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #39 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-10 23:19:56
EDT ---
Since the package is approved, it is up to the submitter o
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #40 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-07-10 23:21:18
EDT ---
hehe to you Lane. No the process isn't over yet. You have
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #41 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-07-14 17:24:53
EDT ---
There is a new upstream release
--
Configure bugmail: h
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #42 from Lane 2009-07-21 01:17:03 EDT ---
The "fedora_cvs" flag is not editable for me. How do I make it edita
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #43 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-07-21 04:34:00
EDT ---
Can you give me your Fedora FAS username please ? I will
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #44 from Lane 2009-07-21 12:21:53 EDT ---
username: dirjud
I just applied to the packager group
--
Configure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #45 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-07-21 12:29:06
EDT ---
You are now sponsored. It might be that you will have to
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
Lane changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
Lane changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #48 from Lane 2009-07-26 18:03:40 EDT ---
Chitlesh,
When I build the EL-5 release of verilator using koji it f
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #49 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-07-26 18:10:08
EDT ---
Give me a few days. I'm in holidays. I'll push it to EL-5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #51 from Fedora Update System
2009-07-26 18:35:36 EDT ---
verilator-3.712-1.fc11 has been submitted as an upda
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #50 from Fedora Update System
2009-07-26 18:35:30 EDT ---
verilator-3.712-1.fc10 has been submitted as an upda
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #53 from Fedora Update System
2009-07-27 17:31:24 EDT ---
verilator-3.712-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #52 from Fedora Update System
2009-07-27 17:28:46 EDT ---
verilator-3.712-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
Jussi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
wsny...@wsnyder.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #29 from wsny...@wsnyder.org 2009-03-28 11:19:13 EDT ---
FYI Verilator 3.702 allows you to set and compile SYSTE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #30 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-06-04 04:31:52
EDT ---
ping Lane ?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redh
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #31 from Lane 2009-06-09 15:26:11 EDT ---
I updated verilator to the latest 3.710 and also switched to using th
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #32 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-06-12 04:54:09
EDT ---
The build is failing under F-11. You can use "mock" to ve
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #33 from wsny...@wsnyder.org 2009-06-12 09:53:47 EDT ---
Grr, every GCC version has slightly different things it
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #34 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-06-13 15:43:47
EDT ---
Lane, the package is ready. please update the package wit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
Chitlesh GOORAH changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
Chitlesh GOORAH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-25 12:36:18
EDT ---
#001: Release:2%{?dist}
This r
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-25 22:00:53
EDT ---
Actually, generally speaking, there is
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #4 from Chitlesh GOORAH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-26 06:27:40
EDT ---
True, but since it's his first package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #5 from Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-26 11:14:00 EDT ---
I have incorporated Chitlesh's feedbackc into an up
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
Itamar Reis Peixoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #7 from Chitlesh GOORAH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-19 17:03:44
EDT ---
#001 You can replace
%setup -q -n %{na
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #8 from Chitlesh GOORAH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-12-04 18:30:56
EDT ---
Ping ?
--
Configure bugmail: https://
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #9 from Chitlesh GOORAH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-12-06 05:36:20
EDT ---
#001: Summary:Verilator is a fa
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #10 from Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-12-06 05:48:30 EDT ---
I am swamped right now with a tape out. I will tr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #11 from Lane 2009-01-01 10:34:07 EDT ---
> #004: Are these useful ?
> /usr/share/verilator/bin
> /usr/share/ve
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #12 from Lane 2009-01-01 11:14:59 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=328036)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #13 from Lane 2009-01-01 11:19:13 EDT ---
I have an updated spec and src file you can download from:
Spec URL:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #15 from Lane 2009-01-01 11:26:33 EDT ---
This is a URL correction of Comment #13
I have an updated spec and s
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #14 from Lane 2009-01-01 11:25:42 EDT ---
Chitlesh,
I would like to get verilator into Fedora 11 if it is not
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #17 from manuel wolfshant 2009-01-02
14:45:41 EDT ---
Lane, at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Sche
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #16 from manuel wolfshant 2009-01-02
14:43:26 EDT ---
The suggestion was to package the example files (i.e. th
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #18 from Lane 2009-01-02 15:23:18 EDT ---
I updated the spec file to move the examples from the data directory
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #19 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-01-03
18:35:56 EDT ---
Lane, you have commented perl-verilog on
#BuildRequires:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #20 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-01-03
19:26:35 EDT ---
#001: These should not be shipped
/usr/share/verilator/i
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #21 from Lane 2009-01-03 19:34:42 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> #002:
>
> do we need to ship these with
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
Chitlesh GOORAH changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #22 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-01-04
06:16:28 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> If you are
> packaging the on
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #23 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-01-04
13:06:33 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> > #004: Are these useful ?
>
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #24 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-01-04
13:07:39 EDT ---
Use perl-SystemPerl as from now on:
Bug 478759 - Review
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
Chitlesh GOORAH changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #25 from Lane 2009-01-09 12:21:48 EDT ---
New files available:
Spec URL: http://brooks.nu/~lane/verilator.spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #26 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-01-09
13:05:10 EDT ---
in file (of verilator) src/V3Options.cpp:
&& !V3Optio
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #27 from Lane 2009-01-10 17:37:49 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #26)
>
> in file (of verilator) src/V3Options.c
63 matches
Mail list logo