Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470
--- Comment #26 from Vivek Shah boni.vi...@gmail.com 2009-07-18 04:21:38 EDT
---
Updated the package as per comment 23
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470
--- Comment #27 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2009-07-18
07:15:03 EDT ---
Small ( mostly cosmetic - there
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470
--- Comment #28 from Vivek Shah boni.vi...@gmail.com 2009-07-18 08:24:37 EDT
---
Thanks for the review. Updated the spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470
--- Comment #29 from R P Herrold herr...@owlriver.com 2009-07-18 10:48:01
EDT ---
On this namespace conflict issue, I was
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470
--- Comment #24 from vivek shah boni.vi...@gmail.com 2009-07-07 11:12:56 EDT
---
Aargh. The comment 14 hyperlink came out
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470
--- Comment #23 from vivek shah boni.vi...@gmail.com 2009-07-07 11:12:05 EDT
---
Hi Mamoru,
Yes the newest srpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470
--- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-07-07
12:18:21 EDT ---
To comment 23:
In my opinion:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470
Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470
vivek shah boni.vi...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470
Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470
manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470
--- Comment #18 from vivek shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-27 02:41:25 EDT ---
I am currently considering of changing the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470
--- Comment #17 from Patrice Dumas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-24 04:00:15 EDT
---
You cannot change the package name if
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470
--- Comment #14 from vivek shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 05:57:08 EDT ---
I have modified the package binary and
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470
--- Comment #15 from Patrice Dumas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 08:44:39 EDT
---
I don't know if you are speaking about
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470
--- Comment #16 from vivek shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 23:40:00 EDT ---
Now this becomes a bit misleading and
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470
--- Comment #11 from Patrice Dumas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-10 11:28:19 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #10)
I don't
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470
--- Comment #12 from Patrice Dumas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-10 11:35:14 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #10)
Please
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470
--- Comment #13 from vivek shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-10 23:34:52 EDT ---
Well I too agree with the issues in the short
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470
--- Comment #10 from vivek shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-07 11:01:54 EDT ---
I have talked with upstream and am going to
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470
Patrice Dumas [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470
--- Comment #8 from vivek shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-02 08:38:07 EDT ---
So in this case although there are no such
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470
--- Comment #9 from manuel wolfshant [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-02 16:51:39
EDT ---
Or simply use
make install
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470
--- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-01 04:52:19
EDT ---
I am quite sure that trying to install
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470
--- Comment #3 from vivek shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-01 07:36:43 EDT ---
As far as Package Naming guidelines are
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470
--- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-01 13:18:47
EDT ---
I was speaking about the binary
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470
--- Comment #5 from vivek shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-01 23:21:10 EDT ---
But why would I want to split the binary name
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470
--- Comment #6 from manuel wolfshant [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-01 23:33:25
EDT ---
Because
a) two letter commands are a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470
--- Comment #1 from vivek shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-01 01:10:48 EDT ---
I had a successful Koji scratch build. Here is
29 matches
Mail list logo
