[Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch)

2009-03-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-18 05:51:10 EDT --- coccinelle-0.1.5-3.fc10.1

[Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch)

2009-03-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch)

2009-03-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-18 15:10:34 EDT --- coccinelle-0.1.5-3.fc10.1

[Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch)

2009-03-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch)

2009-03-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch)

2009-03-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 --- Comment #21 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-03-17 13:09:17 EDT --- Thanks Michal. I'll make the

[Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch)

2009-03-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch)

2009-03-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch)

2009-03-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 --- Comment #16 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-03-16 08:54:11 EDT --- OK! Better late than never ..

[Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch)

2009-03-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 --- Comment #17 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-03-16 08:57:03 EDT --- rpmlint says: coccinelle.src:77: W:

[Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch)

2009-03-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 --- Comment #18 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-03-16 09:00:18 EDT --- Koji scratch build:

[Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch)

2009-03-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 --- Comment #19 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-03-16 09:07:23 EDT --- That didn't work, because of missing

[Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch)

2009-03-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 --- Comment #15 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-03-12 09:10:10 EDT --- On my list for today/tomorrow... --

[Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch)

2009-03-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 Martin Nagy mn...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch)

2009-01-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 --- Comment #13 from Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com 2009-01-29 10:52:10 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330369) --

[Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch)

2009-01-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 --- Comment #12 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-01-28 15:28:58 EDT --- I tried putting the shared library

[Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch)

2009-01-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 --- Comment #11 from Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com 2009-01-27 09:03:26 EDT --- I don't think %{_libdir} is the

[Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch)

2009-01-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 --- Comment #10 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-01-26 10:53:15 EDT --- Phew, that was a bit more

[Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch)

2009-01-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch)

2009-01-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 --- Comment #8 from Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com 2009-01-23 16:11:50 EDT --- Richard, In the Debian review ticket

[Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch)

2009-01-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch)

2009-01-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 --- Comment #4 from Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com 2009-01-22 03:51:35 EDT --- - Shouldn't coccilib go under

[Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch)

2009-01-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 --- Comment #5 from Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com 2009-01-22 04:07:59 EDT --- - I stripped /usr/bin/spatch and it ran

[Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch)

2009-01-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch)

2009-01-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-01-22 15:34:45 EDT --- Thanks, I'm going to try looking at

[Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch)

2009-01-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 --- Comment #7 from Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com 2009-01-22 16:11:51 EDT --- I forgot I had /usr/local/bin/spatch

[Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch)

2009-01-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch)

2009-01-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-01-21 17:19:26 EDT --- Small problem with Python 2.6 in