[Bug 485604] Review Request: gigolo - GIO/GVFS management application

2009-02-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485604 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-15 03:50:28 EDT --- - By the way how we can check if the binary part in waf sc

[Bug 485604] Review Request: gigolo - GIO/GVFS management application

2009-02-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485604 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-15 03:47:49 EDT --- I guess I don't have time to review this, however * Please

[Bug 485604] Review Request: gigolo - GIO/GVFS management application

2009-02-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485604 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-15 22:22:02 EDT --- >I guess I don't have time to review this, however Thank you f

[Bug 485604] Review Request: gigolo - GIO/GVFS management application

2009-02-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485604 Christoph Wickert changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 485604] Review Request: gigolo - GIO/GVFS management application

2009-02-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485604 --- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert 2009-02-19 21:03:50 EDT --- REVIEW for 506fef61941ac763a8bea70a4f98efc0 gigolo-0.2.

[Bug 485604] Review Request: gigolo - GIO/GVFS management application

2009-02-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485604 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 485604] Review Request: gigolo - GIO/GVFS management application

2009-02-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485604 Christoph Wickert changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 485604] Review Request: gigolo - GIO/GVFS management application

2009-02-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485604 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 485604] Review Request: gigolo - GIO/GVFS management application

2009-02-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485604 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 485604] Review Request: gigolo - GIO/GVFS management application

2009-02-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485604 --- Comment #9 from Christoph Wickert 2009-02-22 19:56:53 EDT --- Package should use parallel build: waf %{?_smp_mflags

[Bug 485604] Review Request: gigolo - GIO/GVFS management application

2009-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485604 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 485604] Review Request: gigolo - GIO/GVFS management application

2009-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485604 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 00:06:25 EDT --- gigolo-0.2.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update f

[Bug 485604] Review Request: gigolo - GIO/GVFS management application

2009-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485604 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 00:04:19 EDT --- gigolo-0.2.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update

[Bug 485604] Review Request: gigolo - GIO/GVFS management application

2009-02-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485604 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 15:48:34 EDT --- gigolo-0.2.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10

[Bug 485604] Review Request: gigolo - GIO/GVFS management application

2009-02-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485604 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 485604] Review Request: gigolo - GIO/GVFS management application

2009-02-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485604 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 15:57:39 EDT --- gigolo-0.2.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 s

[Bug 485604] Review Request: gigolo - GIO/GVFS management application

2009-02-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485604 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added -