Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #12 from Valent Turkovic 2009-06-18
08:59:50 EDT ---
When you manage to fix your current issues and build pack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #13 from Patrick Laughton 2009-06-18 11:13:31 EDT
---
I'm waiting on this to test OSM data, myself. :-)
--
C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #14 from Adam Williamson 2009-06-18 13:20:07
EDT ---
I just added a BuildRequires: cvs , built it in mock, and
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #15 from Adam Williamson 2009-06-18 14:07:32
EDT ---
Here's a new build with the CVS buildrequire added, and a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #16 from Adam Williamson 2009-06-18 16:47:09
EDT ---
With the kind assistance of Martin Schaller from upstream
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #17 from Adam Williamson 2009-06-18 17:02:25
EDT ---
my latest SVN .src.rpm is up at
http://adamwill.fedorapeo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #18 from Adam Williamson 2009-07-15 01:39:08
EDT ---
Since the reports of the freetype bug don't seem to be dr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
Callum Lerwick changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #20 from Adam Williamson 2009-07-15 17:15:26
EDT ---
I'm possibly missing a build dependency...check if 'libto
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #21 from Callum Lerwick 2009-07-16 00:55:51 EDT
---
Ah, I was indeed missing libtool. Got it built, and got it
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #22 from Adam Williamson 2009-07-29 14:43:04
EDT ---
update: the freetype issue is being addressed (there's a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
Juha Tuomala changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
Linuxguy123 changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #24 from Adam Williamson 2009-08-03 00:26:05
EDT ---
I'm hoping to have a polished, review-ready package submi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #25 from Linuxguy123 2009-08-03 13:56:01
EDT ---
Will navit build against F11 ?
Any chance that it could be
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #26 from Adam Williamson 2009-08-03 15:47:09
EDT ---
actually the freetype fix was submitted to f11 before it
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #27 from Adam Williamson 2009-08-07 19:35:16
EDT ---
OK, here's a new package. This one's actually review-read
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #28 from Karel Volný 2009-08-19 10:05:51 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #27)
> http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #29 from Adam Williamson 2009-08-19 12:30:03
EDT ---
RTFReadme :)
[ad...@adam ~]$ cat /usr/share/doc/navit-0.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #30 from Karel Volný 2009-08-20 12:47:37 EDT
---
s ...
(In reply to comment #29)
> http://wiki.navit-proj
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #31 from Adam Williamson 2009-08-20 12:56:04
EDT ---
I'm not sure I've ever seen anything in the Data menu. I'
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #32 from Karel Volný 2009-08-21 06:09:28 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #31)
> The default may actually be diffe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #33 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann
2009-08-21 11:33:44 EDT ---
I guess getting GPS position fixes from some GPS d
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #34 from Adam Williamson 2009-08-21 11:45:34
EDT ---
I've already tested it with GPS input (from a Windows Mob
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #35 from Linuxguy123 2009-08-24 16:28:52
EDT ---
I'm happy to see all the activity happening with regards to N
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #36 from Adam Williamson 2009-08-24 19:48:44
EDT ---
no, I'm still waiting for someone to officially approve i
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
Valent Turkovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
Zarko (grof) changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #3 from Valent Turkovic 2009-06-03
10:45:18 EDT ---
Do you need some help?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bug
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-06-08
05:49:42 EDT ---
I'm (and was) a bit short on time. Several stuff needs to
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #6 from Adam Williamson 2009-06-09 20:23:50
EDT ---
forgot to mention, mine has some improvements over Fabian'
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
Adam Williamson changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #7 from Adam Williamson 2009-06-09 20:50:35
EDT ---
btw, I think the -devel package is bogus...the 'libraries'
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter 2009-06-10
16:30:58 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> The spec contributed by Fabian
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #9 from Adam Williamson 2009-06-10 17:24:29
EDT ---
"Yes, your spec file provides some lines to the Fedora spe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
Patrick Laughton changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #11 from Adam Williamson 2009-06-11 15:52:19
EDT ---
I hadn't tried it in mock, so it's possible, but it build
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
Till Maas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #38 from Adam Williamson 2009-09-17 13:39:04
EDT ---
the date guideline seems somewhat absurd as SVN revision
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #39 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-17 14:26:47
EDT ---
But the SVN revision doesn't tell you anything about when
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #40 from Adam Williamson 2009-09-17 14:47:17
EDT ---
it's the wrong place to argue the toss, and i'm going to
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
Adam Williamson changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #42 from Till Maas 2009-09-21 08:48:29 EDT
---
%makeinstall should not be used, is it really needed here?
Refe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #43 from Adam Williamson 2009-09-21 11:00:39
EDT ---
it's probably just a hangover from the MDV package, I'll
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #44 from Till Maas 2009-09-21 11:30:14 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #43)
> Source0 is expected not to work, t
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #45 from Linuxguy123 2009-09-25 13:18:12
EDT ---
I'm happy to see that someone (Adam (et al ?)) are sticking w
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #46 from Adam Williamson 2009-09-25 13:41:31
EDT ---
updated with latest points from Till addressed:
http://a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #47 from Adam Williamson 2009-09-30 14:22:15
EDT ---
ping?
--
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #48 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-10-05 10:24:12
EDT ---
Adam, I suggest you to start another Review Request and cl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #49 from Adam Williamson 2009-10-05 10:46:36
EDT ---
peter: um. why? there doesn't appear to be any process pr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #50 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-10-05 10:54:10
EDT ---
I thought that there will be some issues with rights for s
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #51 from Adam Williamson 2009-10-05 11:05:09
EDT ---
I have supah cow powahz in Bugzilla, I can set any flags
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #53 from Linuxguy123 2009-10-13 19:48:29
EDT ---
Update, please ?
Thanks !
--
Configure bugmail: https://bu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #54 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-10-18 06:47:44
EDT ---
Koji scratchbuild for F-11:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #55 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-10-23 06:00:18
EDT ---
Ping, Adam.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redha
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #56 from Adam Williamson 2009-10-26 16:51:58
EDT ---
i'm ridiculously busy with f12 release right now, have no
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #57 from Linuxguy123 2009-10-27 12:36:36
EDT ---
I'm happy to hear that navit hasn't been abandoned/forgotten.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #58 from Adam Williamson 2009-11-26 16:36:31
EDT ---
OK, I'm looking at the external libraries now. None of th
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652
--- Comment #59 from Adam Williamson 2009-12-11 14:47:22
EDT ---
I did file an upstream ticket:
http://trac.navit-project
62 matches
Mail list logo
