Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577
--- Comment #22 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-01 17:56:35
EDT ---
ping?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/u
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577
--- Comment #20 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-07 11:24:29
EDT ---
ping?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/u
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577
--- Comment #19 from Fabian Affolter 2009-07-22
15:25:28 EDT ---
It seems that upstream will not fix the time stamps issue
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577
--- Comment #18 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-22 08:35:54
EDT ---
ping again
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577
--- Comment #17 from Fabian Affolter 2009-07-10
08:34:29 EDT ---
I will gon on with this as soon as possible. Thanks for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577
--- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-05 06:36:19
EDT ---
ping?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/u
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577
--- Comment #15 from Fabian Affolter 2009-06-16
05:18:14 EDT ---
I will try to spend some time on this package during FUDC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577
--- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-08 14:56:38
EDT ---
ping again?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577
--- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-15 12:03:51
EDT ---
ping?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/u
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577
--- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-03 11:21:38
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > I'
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577
--- Comment #11 from Fabian Affolter 2009-05-03
10:57:00 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> I'll have a new look once you
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577
--- Comment #10 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-29
14:29:31 EDT ---
http://code.google.com/p/xsw/issues/detail?id=27
--
Con
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577
--- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-23 02:10:40
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> > MUST: Optflags are used and tim
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577
--- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-22
18:28:44 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> MUST: The License field in the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577
--- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-19 13:35:06
EDT ---
rpmlint output is clean.
MUST: The package does not yet exi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577
--- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-19
10:44:44 EDT ---
Patching the source is much nicer than my ugly symlink stu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577
--- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-17 05:47:33
EDT ---
Of course, you don't need to use loops, you can just do the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577
--- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-17 04:58:21
EDT ---
Just patch the source code, then there's no need to ship fon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577
--- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-04-16
18:31:25 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> - Any possibility of removing t
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577
--- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-14 07:38:36
EDT ---
The pacakge bitstream-vera-fonts provides the same fonts tha
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577
--- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-14 03:01:28
EDT ---
- Any possibility of removing the bundled fonts?
http://fed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577
Jussi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
24 matches
Mail list logo