Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736
David Sugar changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736
--- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-02 13:30:11
EDT ---
btw, both libeXosip2 and libosip2 are already included into
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736
--- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-02
13:40:07 EDT ---
Some random comments after just glancing at your
spec file:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736
--- Comment #3 from David Sugar 2009-05-02 13:57:35
EDT ---
1. ucommon is NOT the same as commoncpp. Both can also co-ex
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736
--- Comment #4 from David Sugar 2009-05-02 14:12:52
EDT ---
Yes (exosip/osip)...those are also current enough, too! Then
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736
--- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-02
14:20:31 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> 1. ucommon is NOT the same as co
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736
--- Comment #7 from David Sugar 2009-05-02 14:43:36
EDT ---
Opps...wrong url for sipwitch src rpm:
http://www.gnutelephon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736
--- Comment #6 from David Sugar 2009-05-02 14:42:25
EDT ---
Yes, we share the same upstream. Actually there was also a re
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736
Jussi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736
--- Comment #9 from David Sugar 2009-05-03 09:53:16
EDT ---
That is a rather interesting question. Traditionally I have a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736
Mamoru Tasaka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736
--- Comment #11 from David Sugar 2009-05-03 15:33:34
EDT ---
Result of too much last minute editing :)
Added %?dist..
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736
--- Comment #12 from David Sugar 2009-05-03 16:26:53
EDT ---
rpmlint gave me a couple of useful additional things:
ucommo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736
--- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-04
13:57:35 EDT ---
For 2.0.5-3 (after actually rebuilding this package)
* Gro
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736
--- Comment #14 from David Sugar 2009-05-05 04:18:10
EDT ---
I have removed static libs and I think resolved all other iss
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736
David Sugar changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736
Mamoru Tasaka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736
--- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-06
14:10:13 EDT ---
This package itself seems good.
Then when you clean up sipw
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736
Mamoru Tasaka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736
--- Comment #17 from David Sugar 2009-05-08 13:22:10
EDT ---
I created my accounts, certificates, etc...but before I play
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736
Mamoru Tasaka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736
David Sugar changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736
--- Comment #19 from David Sugar 2009-05-10 18:04:49
EDT ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736
Mamoru Tasaka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736
--- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-13
14:13:23 EDT ---
It seems that you are now seeing that your srpm won't build
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System
2009-05-13 18:47:34 EDT ---
ucommon-2.0.5-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System
2009-05-13 18:49:40 EDT ---
ucommon-2.0.5-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System
2009-05-15 19:33:21 EDT ---
ucommon-2.0.5-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System
2009-05-15 19:34:49 EDT ---
ucommon-2.0.5-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736
--- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-16
02:15:23 EDT ---
Now ucommon should build also on dist-f12, please try.
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736
--- Comment #27 from David Sugar 2009-05-16 07:36:26
EDT ---
checking now. If it builds, do I do a "make update" in devel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736
--- Comment #28 from David Sugar 2009-05-16 08:07:21
EDT ---
Never mind. sipwitch built fine too now in rawhide/f12.
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736
--- Comment #29 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-16
09:50:25 EDT ---
Okay, thank you.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.r
36 matches
Mail list logo
