[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format

2009-07-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #36 from Jindrich Novy 2009-07-29 07:33:15 EDT --- /me is back. Thanks to all you guys for importing xz! --

[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format

2009-07-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format

2009-07-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format

2009-07-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #33 from Bill Nottingham 2009-07-20 10:49:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #31) > Will F-10/F-11 users (for ins

[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format

2009-07-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #32 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-07-19 04:20:43 EDT --- Ops, yeah, I just came back from a vacation (forgot to pu

[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format

2009-07-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #31 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-07-18 19:13:38 EDT --- Will F-10/F-11 users (for instance: package reviewer

[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format

2009-07-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 Bill Nottingham changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format

2009-07-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 Bill Nottingham changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format

2009-07-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format

2009-07-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #28 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-07-17 14:08:21 EDT --- Thank you all for finishing the review. Me and many

[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format

2009-07-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 Bill Nottingham changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format

2009-07-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #27 from Bill Nottingham 2009-07-17 14:02:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package N

[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format

2009-07-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format

2009-07-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #25 from Bill Nottingham 2009-07-17 12:52:21 EDT --- OK, new files: http://notting.fedorapeople.org/review/xz

[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format

2009-07-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #24 from Bill Nottingham 2009-07-17 11:38:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > I looked over the licensing a

[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format

2009-07-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format

2009-07-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #22 from Bill Nottingham 2009-07-14 10:18:59 EDT --- I lied. triggers only fire on package names. Sorry. --

[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format

2009-07-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #21 from Bill Nottingham 2009-07-14 10:08:55 EDT --- Orcan: shouldn't be an issue; triggers will fire on the p

[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format

2009-07-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #20 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-07-11 17:41:22 EDT --- Any ideas how I should handle the %trigger* lzma par

[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format

2009-07-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #19 from Bill Nottingham 2009-07-09 14:44:17 EDT --- Fixed. Didn't bump the release just for that. :) -- Con

[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format

2009-07-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #18 from Ondrej Vasik 2009-07-09 14:42:27 EDT --- Just one small comment - in description is a typo "purporse"

[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format

2009-07-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #17 from Bill Nottingham 2009-07-09 14:32:33 EDT --- OK, new files: http://notting.fedorapeople.org/review/xz

[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format

2009-07-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 Ondrej Vasik changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format

2009-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #14 from Panu Matilainen 2009-07-01 07:30:16 EDT --- One possibility would be using a snapshot from the git re

[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format

2009-06-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #13 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-06-30 17:11:14 EDT --- Orcan, I'm really sorry for my late response, but I'm hav

[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format

2009-06-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #12 from Bill Nottingham 2009-06-24 10:29:49 EDT --- I don't think alternatives is correct when one package is

[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format

2009-06-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format

2009-06-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #10 from Jindrich Novy 2009-06-22 04:20:32 EDT --- The best solution seems to be to add lzma-compat package wh

[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format

2009-06-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #9 from Panu Matilainen 2009-06-22 00:34:00 EDT --- Sure, that'd work too, it just a) requires changes to exis

[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format

2009-06-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #8 from Ville Skyttä 2009-06-21 05:32:31 EDT --- Well, an AFAICT complete working solution was already given i

[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format

2009-06-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #7 from Jindrich Novy 2009-06-19 07:45:50 EDT --- New files are here: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/xz

[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format

2009-06-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 Panu Matilainen changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format

2009-06-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #5 from Jindrich Novy 2009-06-17 14:39:51 EDT --- Ok, there is another iteration of packages here: http://peop

[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format

2009-06-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #4 from Ville Skyttä 2009-06-17 12:25:05 EDT --- I think obsoleting lzma-libs and lzma-devel is definitely pre

[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format

2009-06-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #3 from Jindrich Novy 2009-06-17 02:47:09 EDT --- Milos, thanks for taking the review and posting here the mai

[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format

2009-06-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #2 from Ville Skyttä 2009-06-16 18:01:58 EDT --- For the record and FWIW, the "my specfile" referred to in com

[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format

2009-06-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 Milos Jakubicek changed: What|Removed |Added --