Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System
2009-08-10 17:45:07 EDT ---
jide-oss-2.7.1-3.1181svn.fc10 has been pushed to the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System
2009-08-10 17:42:51 EDT ---
jide-oss-2.7.1-3.1181svn.fc11 has been pushed to the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System
2009-08-08 15:24:22 EDT ---
jide-oss-2.7.1-3.1181svn.fc10 has been pushed to the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System
2009-08-07 20:38:37 EDT ---
jide-oss-2.7.1-3.1181svn.fc10 has been submitted as
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System
2009-08-07 20:37:04 EDT ---
jide-oss-2.7.1-3.1181svn.fc11 has been submitted as
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074
--- Comment #17 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-08-07
14:11:19 EDT ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Na
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074
--- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-07 14:04:45
EDT ---
Why no F-10 branch?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzill
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074
--- Comment #15 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-08-07
10:09:46 EDT ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Na
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074
Hicham HAOUARI changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074
--- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-07 09:28:16
EDT ---
Yes, yes, import the package already!
And update the other
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074
--- Comment #13 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-08-07
09:16:09 EDT ---
updated the spec file.
Spec URL: http://hicham.fedorapeop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074
--- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-07 09:07:36
EDT ---
Summary: User documentation for %{name}
^^^
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074
--- Comment #11 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-08-07
08:45:32 EDT ---
updated the spec file.
Spec URL: http://hicham.fedorapeop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074
--- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-07 08:23:12
EDT ---
What do you mean by location?
%files doc
%defattr(-,root,r
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074
--- Comment #9 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-08-07
08:20:09 EDT ---
which location should i use for the doc package?
--
Confi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074
--- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-07 01:04:49
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> the doc package should include th
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074
--- Comment #7 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-08-06
20:50:04 EDT ---
the doc package should include the pdf file only?
--
Conf
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074
Jussi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074
--- Comment #5 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-08-06
13:41:52 EDT ---
is the package ok now ?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bug
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074
--- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-06 13:16:15
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> the jar is versioned by upstream.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074
--- Comment #3 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-08-06
12:52:20 EDT ---
the jar is versioned by upstream.
I updated the spec file.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074
--- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-06 12:10:59
EDT ---
Also, you can drop BR: dos2unix if you just use
https://fedo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074
Jussi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074
Hicham HAOUARI changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
28 matches
Mail list logo