Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525909
--- Comment #17 from Søren Sandmann Pedersen sandm...@redhat.com 2009-11-09
15:02:47 EDT ---
Which version of the sysprof
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525909
William Lovaton walova...@yahoo.com.mx changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525909
Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525909
Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525909
Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525909
Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525909
--- Comment #3 from Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com 2009-09-27 10:20:13 EDT
---
Thanks Jussi, really appreciated! I'm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525909
--- Comment #4 from Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com 2009-09-27 10:28:39 EDT
---
Soeren, can you help me refine the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525909
--- Comment #5 from Søren Sandmann Pedersen sandm...@redhat.com 2009-09-27
10:45:30 EDT ---
Something like this maybe:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525909
--- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-09-27 11:52:46
EDT ---
Hmm, on x86-64 I get
$ sysprof
Time to
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525909
--- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-09-27 12:06:25
EDT ---
By the way, I'd appreciate if you could
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525909
--- Comment #8 from Søren Sandmann Pedersen sandm...@redhat.com 2009-09-27
12:58:36 EDT ---
Jussi, is that on a 2.6.31
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525909
--- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-09-27 13:11:41
EDT ---
No, on 2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525909
--- Comment #10 from Søren Sandmann Pedersen sandm...@redhat.com 2009-09-27
13:17:32 EDT ---
It requires 2.6.31 to work,
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525909
--- Comment #11 from Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com 2009-09-27 17:17:36
EDT ---
I didn't put an explicit dependency on
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525909
--- Comment #1 from Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com 2009-09-26 19:39:54 EDT
---
This package was in Fedora but moved to
16 matches
Mail list logo