Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #57 from Dave Malcolm 2010-01-09 12:28:03 EST
---
The remaining issues from comment #56:
> - a reviewer needs to g
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #58 from Dave Malcolm 2010-01-09 12:29:51 EST
---
> how to "bake in" the result at build time in a way that works i
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #56 from Dave Malcolm 2010-01-07 21:12:33
EDT ---
Replying to comment #55:
Thanks! I've added a %check to the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
Dave Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #55 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-23
17:10:22 EDT ---
Sorry for the delay:
You could add a %check section:
%chec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #54 from Dave Malcolm 2009-11-20 14:17:58
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #53)
> I can't get runtests.sh working.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #53 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-18
16:17:35 EDT ---
I can't get runtests.sh working...
When running, all tests
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #52 from Dave Malcolm 2009-11-18 10:30:40
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #51)
> hmm i am curious why not call py
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
Rudolf Kastl changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #50 from Dave Malcolm 2009-11-17 22:00:25
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #47)
> Created an attachment (id=369966
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #49 from Andrew McNabb 2009-11-17 17:02:27
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #48)
>
> I wouldn't worry too much ab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #48 from Andrew McNabb 2009-11-17 16:56:49
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #46)
> - fixup the factual errors in
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #47 from Andrew McNabb 2009-11-17 16:44:32
EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=369966)
--> (https://bugzilla.re
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #46 from Dave Malcolm 2009-11-17 15:52:43
EDT ---
I read through the history here, and tried to summarize the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #45 from Dave Malcolm 2009-11-04 13:09:39
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #43)
> I'll look at doing something sim
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #44 from Dave Malcolm 2009-11-04 12:50:08
EDT ---
> Having said that, it only affects systems with python-deve
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #43 from Dave Malcolm 2009-11-04 12:49:18
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #42)
> (In reply to comment #41)
> > Re
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #42 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-11-03
20:24:50 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #41)
> Re (ii), is there a sta
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #41 from Dave Malcolm 2009-11-03 13:56:50
EDT ---
Thanks; I've addressed most of the above; here's the latest
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
Dave Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #40 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-10-30
20:16:40 EDT ---
Clarification:
> We don't need this::
> [ -d $RPM_
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #39 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-10-30
20:14:13 EDT ---
Python 3.* isn't very standard across packages. Si
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #38 from Dave Malcolm 2009-10-29 23:23:43
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #37)
> The current specfile puts %{pyli
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #37 from Andrew McNabb 2009-10-29 15:16:08
EDT ---
The current specfile puts %{pylibdir}/config/* into the dev
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
Dave Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #36 from Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams 2009-10-28
01:46:45 EDT ---
I'm fine with switching it to whoever come the app
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
Andrew McNabb changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #35 from Andrew McNabb 2009-10-28 00:13:23
EDT ---
Wow. You've made tremendous progress. The remaining rpmli
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #34 from Dave Malcolm 2009-10-27 20:39:59
EDT ---
Updated specfile: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/python3.s
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #33 from Andrew McNabb 2009-10-27 12:45:12
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #32)
>
> FWIW I think this is still t
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #32 from Dave Malcolm 2009-10-26 19:23:44
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #31)
> (In reply to comment #29)
> > (I
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #31 from Dave Malcolm 2009-10-23 19:51:58
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #29)
> (In reply to comment #26)
> > Da
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
Dave Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #30 from Andrew McNabb 2009-10-22 20:47:22
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #29)
>
> I want to build up a full py
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #29 from Dave Malcolm 2009-10-22 19:43:24
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> Dave, I've downloaded your new s
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #28 from Dave Malcolm 2009-10-22 18:16:50
EDT ---
Of the rpmlint warnings, I think that the following are igno
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #27 from Dave Malcolm 2009-10-22 18:05:11
EDT ---
(Andrew, thanks; I'll respond to comment #26, but here's wha
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #26 from Andrew McNabb 2009-10-22 14:59:56
EDT ---
Dave, I've downloaded your new specfile and taken a look at
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #25 from Dave Malcolm 2009-10-22 11:44:32
EDT ---
Updated specfile: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/python3.s
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #24 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-10-21 18:51:06
EDT ---
The review process does depend on the reporter field to be
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #23 from Dave Malcolm 2009-10-21 18:27:13
EDT ---
> Since Dave is working so hard on this, I think it would be
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #22 from Andrew McNabb 2009-10-21 18:07:44
EDT ---
Since Dave is working so hard on this, I think it would be
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #21 from Dave Malcolm 2009-10-21 16:07:11
EDT ---
I've fixed some of the rpmlint issues.
Updated specfile her
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #20 from Dave Malcolm 2009-10-20 19:45:09
EDT ---
I've had a go at merging Andrew and Ignacio's specfiles, usi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #19 from Andrew McNabb 2009-10-20 12:05:57
EDT ---
Dave, I think it makes sense to block the private libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #18 from Dave Malcolm 2009-10-19 15:20:44
EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=365268)
--> (https://bugzilla.red
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #17 from Dave Malcolm 2009-10-19 15:19:53
EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=365267)
--> (https://bugzilla.red
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #16 from James Antill 2009-10-17
01:40:32 EDT ---
> A package that works with both python2 and python3 ... is
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #15 from Steve Traylen 2009-10-16 18:54:29
EDT ---
For comment #14 and the problem of two versions of say, SOA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #14 from Andrew McNabb 2009-10-16 18:22:58
EDT ---
James, thanks for the informative link.
One of the concern
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #13 from James Antill 2009-10-16
17:20:57 EDT ---
> James, thanks for your thoughts. By the way, why are you
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #12 from Andrew McNabb 2009-10-15 19:06:52
EDT ---
Ignacio, thanks for your help. For the record, I'm really
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #11 from Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams 2009-10-15
16:31:12 EDT ---
2) The .list thing was experimental. Feel free to
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #10 from Andrew McNabb 2009-10-14 12:47:38
EDT ---
James, thanks for your thoughts. By the way, why are you w
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #9 from James Antill 2009-10-14 01:35:27
EDT ---
I'm pretty worried about multiple installable python's, so I
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #8 from Andrew McNabb 2009-10-13 17:26:22
EDT ---
Dave, thank you very much for your insightful thoughts. I a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
Dave Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
Dave Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Kowaliczek 2009-09-29
20:01:58 EDT ---
Ah i see now it works :)
--
Configure bugmail: https:/
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #4 from Andrew McNabb 2009-09-29 12:15:08
EDT ---
Thomas, I've tried downloading the files from a few differen
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
Rahul Sundaram changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
Thomas Kowaliczek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
Andrew McNabb changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126
--- Comment #1 from Andrew McNabb 2009-09-28 18:42:50
EDT ---
By the way, this is my first Fedora package, so I would grea
64 matches
Mail list logo
