Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740
--- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-02 13:12:11
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> Ok for mpqc, but not f2c.
>
>
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740
--- Comment #15 from Carl Byington 2009-12-02 13:02:30
EDT ---
Ok for mpqc, but not f2c.
rpm -q --requires f2c
libc.so.6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740
--- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-02 12:30:08
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Currently f2c does not require
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740
--- Comment #13 from Carl Byington 2009-12-02 11:19:30
EDT ---
I don't see any documentation files specific to the -libs p
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740
--- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-02 05:17:19
EDT ---
Oh, and move the license files (and any other general files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740
--- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-02 05:17:48
EDT ---
Of course, not having documentation in some subpackage is O
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740
--- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-02 05:12:13
EDT ---
f2c-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
f2c-libs.x86_64: E: n
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740
--- Comment #9 from Carl Byington 2009-12-01 21:59:09
EDT ---
Source updated from netlib, 0 dropped from patch, patch redo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740
--- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-01 04:04:46
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> I don't see the need to continue
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740
Terje Røsten changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740
--- Comment #6 from Carl Byington 2009-11-30 20:47:06
EDT ---
Those should all be fixed in:
http://www.five-ten-sg.com/f2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740
--- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-11-30 19:03:22
EDT ---
- Instead of
%define libname f2c-libs
%package -n %{li
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740
--- Comment #4 from Carl Byington 2009-11-30 18:56:21
EDT ---
Those should all be fixed in:
http://www.five-ten-sg.com/f2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740
--- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-11-30 15:28:54
EDT ---
- You don't need to obsolete f2c-libs anymore. Drop it.
- Y
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740
--- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-11-30 15:26:45
EDT ---
- Move the static library to a -static subpackage (or don't
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740
Jussi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740
Carl Byington changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740
Carl Byington changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740
Carl Byington changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740
--- Comment #1 from Carl Byington 2009-11-30 12:35:42
EDT ---
It helps if I use the proper URLs.
Spec URL: http://www.fiv
20 matches
Mail list logo
