[Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine

2010-01-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-07 12:49:02 EDT --- (By the way the macro %ruby_sitelib is used nowhere so this

[Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine

2010-01-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-07 12:29:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Actually rubygem-actionpack is

[Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine

2010-01-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-06 12:43:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Well, I have not looked into th

[Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine

2010-01-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine

2010-01-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-05 12:47:06 EDT --- Well, I have not looked into the newest srpm yet, however a

[Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine

2010-01-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 --- Comment #11 from Michal Babej 2010-01-05 09:47:28 EDT --- OK, i did some changes: - update to 2.2.16 - got rid of test

[Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine

2009-12-31 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine

2009-12-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-23 10:58:45 EDT --- Well, for now I won't object to use %test_files. So would yo

[Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine

2009-12-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 --- Comment #8 from Michal Babej 2009-12-18 08:46:33 EDT --- I asked one of the developers, he said test/*/*_test.rb --

[Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine

2009-12-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-11 12:45:19 EDT --- Well, then first of all how did you determine the list of %t

[Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine

2009-12-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 --- Comment #6 from Michal Babej 2009-12-09 13:14:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > > - It seems filters related de

[Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine

2009-12-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine

2009-12-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 --- Comment #4 from Michal Babej 2009-12-04 11:31:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > * %define -> %global > - Now Fed

[Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine

2009-12-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-03 13:23:10 EDT --- Some notes: * %define -> %global - Now Fedora prefers to

[Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine

2009-12-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 Michal Babej changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine

2009-12-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 --- Comment #2 from Michal Babej 2009-12-02 14:42:15 EDT --- Done. Updated packages are at the same place (http://moguraku

[Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine

2009-12-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-02 13:38:54 EDT --- $ gem list -b haml returns that the latest is 2.2.15 and it