rpms/perl-Net-SSH-Perl/devel perl-Net-SSH-Perl.spec,1.9,1.10

2008-11-04 Thread Paul Howarth
Author: pghmcfc Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Net-SSH-Perl/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20965 Modified Files: perl-Net-SSH-Perl.spec Log Message: Run tests in en_US locale, so spell checker doesn't complain about the use of American English when the host is

rpms/perl-Email-Date/devel perl-Email-Date.spec,1.5,1.6

2008-11-04 Thread Tom Callaway
Author: spot Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Email-Date/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28639/devel Modified Files: perl-Email-Date.spec Log Message: fix missing requires Index: perl-Email-Date.spec

rpms/perl-Email-Date/F-9 perl-Email-Date.spec,1.5,1.6

2008-11-04 Thread Tom Callaway
Author: spot Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Email-Date/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28765/F-9 Modified Files: perl-Email-Date.spec Log Message: fix missing requires Index: perl-Email-Date.spec ==

[Bug 469612] Net::SSH::Perl is at 1.33

2008-11-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469612 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-04 06:30:29 EDT --- perl-Net-SSH-Perl-1.33-2.fc10 has

[Bug 468716] Missing Requires -- Email::Abstract

2008-11-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468716 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-04 11:24:56 EDT --- perl-Email-Date-1.103-4.fc9 has be

rpms/perl-Mail-Box/F-9 perl-Mail-Box.spec,1.7,1.8 sources,1.4,1.5

2008-11-04 Thread Tom Callaway
Author: spot Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Mail-Box/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32044/F-9 Modified Files: perl-Mail-Box.spec sources Log Message: update to 2.084 Index: perl-Mail-Box.spec === R

rpms/perl-Mail-Box/devel .cvsignore, 1.4, 1.5 perl-Mail-Box.spec, 1.7, 1.8 sources, 1.4, 1.5

2008-11-04 Thread Tom Callaway
Author: spot Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Mail-Box/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32044/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-Mail-Box.spec sources Log Message: update to 2.084 Index: .cvsignore ==

[Bug 469736] Please upgrade perl-Mail-Box to current version (2.084)

2008-11-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469736 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-04 11:52:20 EDT --- perl-Mail-Box-2.084-1.fc9 has been

[Bug 469736] Please upgrade perl-Mail-Box to current version (2.084)

2008-11-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469736 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-04 11:52:23 EDT --- perl-Mail-Box-2.084-1.fc10 has bee

rpms/perl-Net-SSH-Perl/F-9 14964AC8.asc, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 perl-Net-SSH-Perl.spec, 1.7, 1.8 sources, 1.2, 1.3

2008-11-04 Thread Paul Howarth
Author: pghmcfc Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Net-SSH-Perl/F-9 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25270 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-Net-SSH-Perl.spec sources Added Files: 14964AC8.asc Log Message: * Tue Nov 4 2008 Paul Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1.33-2 -

[Bug 469612] Net::SSH::Perl is at 1.33

2008-11-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469612 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-04 06:51:41 EDT --- perl-Net-SSH-Perl-1.33-2.fc9 has b

[Bug 469612] Net::SSH::Perl is at 1.33

2008-11-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469612 --- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-04 06:19:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > I'm looking at