- Glen g...@empireenterprises.com wrote:
I want to get a perl module included in the default redhat distro.
How do I go about this?
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
Hello all,
if you are doing updates of perl or modules with bodhi
please don't mention RHEL bugs as #507378. Especially
if you set close with stable update ;-)
Thank you and best regards,
--
Marcela Mašláňová
BaseOS team Brno
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
- Tom \spot\ Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
Okay, so with all of that said, let me discuss what would happen if
we
were to switch the naming of perl and perl-core tomorrow:
* Any packages which still have Requires: perl , rather than a more
specific Requires: perl(foo::bar) would
* Rename perl to perl-minimal
+1
They should either have:
1. If they're version dependent, they should have
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
+1
Marcela
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Hello,
our new split of upstream perl package into perl-core and many
other perl-Some-Module was criticised at p5p
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.perl.perl5.porters/72031
I'm not sure who decided the split and why we did this, but someone
should answer reasonably which means better
On 06/29/2009 04:33 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Author: mmaslano
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Wx/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv22957
Modified Files:
perl-Wx.spec Log Message:
* Mon Jun 29 2009 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com - 0.91-3
Perl development group in comps again! In case you check available
groups in yum, then you can see there is no problem in adding another one.
As was mentioned in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508194
some of our users might find this group useful. I suppose Chris Weyl has
good
On 04/10/2009 01:28 AM, Chris Weyl wrote:
Hey all --
We're starting to have a greater number of packages geared towards Perl
development... Given that it'd be nice to have them all easily presented
for those so inclined, I thought it might be nice to have a Perl
Development comps.xml group.
Gabor Szabo wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com wrote:
Chris Weyl wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 5:06 AM, Marcela Maslanova
mmasl...@redhat.comwrote:
Chris Weyl wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Gabor Szabo szab...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu
Chris Weyl wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Gabor Szabo szab...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:44 AM, Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com
wrote:
Would be someone interested in packaging those
Chris Weyl wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 5:06 AM, Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.comwrote:
Chris Weyl wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Gabor Szabo szab...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu
wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:44
Jesse Keating wrote:
There is no content checked into this module, what's going on here?
I'm sorry this package was lost somewhere. I built and import it into
all branches.
--
Marcela Mašláňová
BaseOS team Brno
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Would be someone interested in packaging those mentioned plugins? Also
if someone is interested in {co-}maintainance of Padre I'll be happy.
--
Marcela Mašláňová
BaseOS team Brno
---BeginMessage---
Hi Marcela and Jérôme,
as the Mandriva and Fedora maintainers could you also
start looking at the
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Hi,
Big fat WARNING: I am about to upgrade perl-Email-Simple on rawhide to
upstream 2.005
This upgrade breaks compatiblity to its predecessors, because it abandons
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Email/Simple/Headers.pm
aka.
perl(Email::Simple::Headers)
Please check
Chris Weyl wrote:
Hey all --
I've build and submitted Fedora::Bugzilla for F-10, rawhide. It could
still use some love (namely: documentation, reassignment/status of
bugs, and a more comprehensive test suite), but it works and works
well. It also has a superset of the functionality needed for
Chris Weyl wrote:
Hey all --
I've been poking around the last couple weeks, working on a
replacement for my old post-to-review script. It's called
reviewtool, and handles the various submission steps nicely at the
moment. Support to take/review packages is coming, but not yet there.
It is
Chris Weyl wrote:
This seems like a good idea -- everything seems to be working pretty
smoothly right now, but it seems like a step in the right direction as
we have more and more SIG maintained perl bits (the stuff formerly
belonging to JPO comes to mind). Should we adopt it as our policy
Gabor Szabo wrote:
Marcela,
FYI Padre 0.14 has been released to CPAN.
regards
Gabor
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
Gabor Szabo wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Marcela Maslanova [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gabor Szabo wrote:
Marcela,
FYI Padre 0.14 has been released to CPAN.
regards
Gabor
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list
Gabor Szabo wrote:
Marcela,
is there any chance Padre making it into the upcoming release of Fedora?
What is still stopping it?
Gabor
It takes so long, because not many people are interested in reviewing
padre and his prerequisite. Finally I asked some directly some people
for missing
Gabor Szabo wrote:
Thanks.
In the meantime I have just released v0.10 of Padre.
Gabor
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Marcela Maslanova [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gabor Szabo wrote:
Padre 0.07 has been released to CPAN.
Marcela,
could you please push it out to rawhide and/or let me what
Robin Norwood wrote:
So, perl-RPM2 fails to build in rawhide after recent rpm changes. The
upstream maintainer no longer has interest in the module, so as things
stand it's dead in CPAN until and unless someone takes it over. The
breakage seems to be due to internal changes in rpm. I might
Do we have some other package which can replace RPM2? It can't be build
possibly because of change in rpm-libs. Also the last release is two
years old.
I suggest drop it.
--
Marcela Mašláňová
BaseOS team Brno
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
* Marcela Maslanova [17/09/2008 11:15] :
Do we have some other package which can replace RPM2? It can't be build
possibly because of change in rpm-libs. Also the last release is two
years old.
There's always RPM4 by Olivier Thauvin.
http://search.cpan.org
Gabor Szabo wrote:
Padre 0.07 has been released to CPAN.
Marcela,
could you please push it out to rawhide and/or let me what are the obstacles?
regards
Gabor
I'm waiting for review ORLite. After inclusion of this package I should
be able to push Padre.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
I try to find solution for missing shared objects on internet, but I
found only your question on the same problem ;-) Could be possible that
Wx is broken? There are some seriously looking bugs at
http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Dist/Display.html?Name=Wx
I hope that you found out at conference and now
Gabor Szabo wrote:
2008/8/29 Marcela Maslanova [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I try to find solution for missing shared objects on internet, but I found
only your question on the same problem ;-) Could be possible that Wx is
broken? There are some seriously looking bugs at
http://rt.cpan.org/Public
Chris Weyl wrote:
Hey all --
Just a quick note before I toddle off to bed.
I've updated the updates site to use the fedora.css styling rather
than the older, original model. This not only complies with the goal
of having one common fedora stylesheet, but also deals rather nicely
with the
Hello,
I tried with new version, but I have the same error message. At least I
create review tickets for all Padre dependencies.
*457517:* Review Request: perl-Padre
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457517
*458653:* Review Request: perl-Devel-PerlySense
Gabor Szabo wrote:
Hi,
I have just released the first public version of Padre -
Perl Application Development and Refactoring Environment
as a CPAN module.
See http://search.cpan.org/dist/Padre/
It is basically an editor with an oversized ego.
I would like to make sure it can easily added to
Please someone review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457505
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457517
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
I found some old bugs from F7 and F8, which are still assigned on jpo. I
suppose these packages were split between us. Could you please look at
them before heavy automatic cleaning of bugzilla (F7)?
/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
The same problem has perl-Test-AutoBuild.
--
Marcela Maslanova
BaseOS team Brno
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman
Hello perl-devel-list members,
did someone look at #142837
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=142837 - Need
site-specific man page directory? If you have some ideas, wouldn't be
the best thing to solve it now, when we are changing things for perl-5.10?
Marcela Mašláňová
--
Fedora
If it's /usr/local perl standart so let's use it.
Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 16:09 +0100, Marcela Maslanova wrote:
Hello perl-devel-list members,
did someone look at #142837
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=142837 - Need
site-specific man page directory
35 matches
Mail list logo
