On 7/13/07, skaller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The two problems would be:
* is it available out of the box on Cywgin, Windows, and OSX
Well, it's not installed by default on any of those, of course. It works
well on macs, but windows? eh, haven't tried it yet :) I finally got me a
macbook
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 20:40 -0700, Erick Tryzelaar wrote:
>
> I'd like to do this, some time. The problem is that, pratically
> speaking, it's only skaller checking things into the repository. That,
> and branching still really sucks in subversion. I'm experimenting with
> git to see how effective
thanks for the info. i've used SVN and yeah it is a pain :-( darcs? :-)
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just dat
I'd like to do this, some time. The problem is that, pratically speaking,
it's only skaller checking things into the repository. That, and branching
still really sucks in subversion. I'm experimenting with git to see how
effective we could be using that to develop felix (and other projects). If
we
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 13:23 -0700, Raoul Duke wrote:
> > Yes, it should work now ..
>
> immaupdating as we speak so to speak.
>
> > that doesn't mean it's stable ..
> > things can change fast around here :)
>
> Any chance of there being a stable branch that is kept mostly safe and
> working, and
> Yes, it should work now ..
immaupdating as we speak so to speak.
> that doesn't mean it's stable ..
> things can change fast around here :)
Any chance of there being a stable branch that is kept mostly safe and
working, and things get merged into over time? Speaking only for
myself, obviously,
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 13:01 -0700, Raoul Duke wrote:
> hi,
>
> > svn update
> > Looks like an old version.
>
> it is... per the previous email thread where i was warned svn is
> unstable ;-) and that i should use revision 1546. i'll try updating to
> tip-of-tree and see how it goes!
BTW: if you
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 13:01 -0700, Raoul Duke wrote:
> hi,
>
> > svn update
> > Looks like an old version.
>
> it is... per the previous email thread where i was warned svn is
> unstable ;-) and that i should use revision 1546. i'll try updating to
> tip-of-tree and see how it goes!
Yes, it shou
hi,
> svn update
> Looks like an old version.
it is... per the previous email thread where i was warned svn is
unstable ;-) and that i should use revision 1546. i'll try updating to
tip-of-tree and see how it goes!
thanks.
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 11:30 -0700, Raoul Duke wrote:
> hi,
>
> (I was on PPC OS X but switched to x86 CentOS.) I've managed to work
> through some basic issues with my machine's setup, and things are
> building, but I guess maybe there are some path things I don't grok?
> It looks to me like all t
hi,
(I was on PPC OS X but switched to x86 CentOS.) I've managed to work
through some basic issues with my machine's setup, and things are
building, but I guess maybe there are some path things I don't grok?
It looks to me like all the unit tests are failing? Random sample
output below. Any ideas
11 matches
Mail list logo
