Re: [Felix-language] bitstream pattern matching

2006-12-28 Thread skaller
On Thu, 2006-12-28 at 10:06 +0100, Ulf Wiger (TN/EAB) wrote: > Maybe PADS/ML would be an easier fit for Felix? > > http://www.padsproj.org/papers/popl07.pdf > > (There is also a PADS/C library for generating C code.) With a "no commercial use" clause in the licence ;( It is interesting though .

Re: [Felix-language] bitstream pattern matching

2006-12-28 Thread Ulf Wiger (TN/EAB)
e ML-oriented. BR, Ulf W > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of skaller > Sent: den 22 december 2006 01:41 > To: Erick Tryzelaar > Cc: felix-language > Subject: Re: [Felix-language] bitstream pattern matching > >

Re: [Felix-language] bitstream pattern matching

2006-12-21 Thread skaller
On Thu, 2006-12-21 at 13:33 -0800, Erick Tryzelaar wrote: > I wonder if something like this would be worthwhile adding to felix. > It's a paper discussion the implementation of erlang's bit stream > programming: > > http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/1921 > I've seen it. There's lots of thing

[Felix-language] bitstream pattern matching

2006-12-21 Thread Erick Tryzelaar
I wonder if something like this would be worthwhile adding to felix. It's a paper discussion the implementation of erlang's bit stream programming: http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/1921 I've done a bit of bit-level programming, and it's a royal pain. Something like this would make it stupid