skaller wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 21:07 -0800, Erick Tryzelaar wrote:
>
>
>>> Problem is import etc can be used for both importing
>>> macros, but can also import other stuff .. hard to
>>> know the difference. This needs revisiting.
>>>
>> is there another place we could open this u
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 21:07 -0800, Erick Tryzelaar wrote:
> > Problem is import etc can be used for both importing
> > macros, but can also import other stuff .. hard to
> > know the difference. This needs revisiting.
>
> is there another place we could open this up for more opinions? Perhaps
>
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 21:07 -0800, Erick Tryzelaar wrote:
> skaller wrote:
> >> These times are pretty disheartening. I can't imagine trying to work
> >> with a 10k line felix program.
> >
> > Errmm .. but the problem here is g++ isn't it?
>
> Well sure, but we're generating code that make g++ v
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 21:07 -0800, Erick Tryzelaar wrote:
> skaller wrote:
> >> These times are pretty disheartening. I can't imagine trying to work
> >> with a 10k line felix program.
> >
> > Errmm .. but the problem here is g++ isn't it?
>
> Well sure, but we're generating code that make g++ v
skaller wrote:
>> These times are pretty disheartening. I can't imagine trying to work
>> with a 10k line felix program.
>
> Errmm .. but the problem here is g++ isn't it?
Well sure, but we're generating code that make g++ very unhappy. I guess
things will be better whenever we get partial comp
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 02:32 -0800, Erick Tryzelaar wrote:
> skaller wrote:
> >> Oddly enough, it's gcc.
> These times are pretty disheartening. I can't imagine trying to work
> with a 10k line felix program.
Errmm .. but the problem here is g++ isn't it?
> It certainly would be interesting if
skaller wrote:
>> Oddly enough, it's gcc.
>
> This is not odd. Gcc is a dog. What do you expect from an Open
> Source project? Optimisation is particularly slow.
>
> However gcc 4.x does produce half way reasonable code.
> It does do data flow analysis now, which is more than
> Felix does. However
On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 10:33 -0800, Erick Tryzelaar wrote:
> skaller wrote:
> > A parser should be fun to write .. and quite easy using the GLR parsing
> > feature .. although lisp is rather trivial to parse .. and I guess
> > you would probably use lisp to parse lisp .. :)
> >
>
> Hmm, that would
skaller wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 02:49 -0800, Erick Tryzelaar wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I finally got around to implementing my port of the tiny lisp
>> implementation from here:
>>
>> http://www.defmacro.org/ramblings/lisp-in-haskell.html
>>
>> It's pretty fun. While it doesn't actually
On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 02:49 -0800, Erick Tryzelaar wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I finally got around to implementing my port of the tiny lisp
> implementation from here:
>
> http://www.defmacro.org/ramblings/lisp-in-haskell.html
>
> It's pretty fun. While it doesn't actually parse syntax yet,
A p
Hi everyone,
I finally got around to implementing my port of the tiny lisp
implementation from here:
http://www.defmacro.org/ramblings/lisp-in-haskell.html
It's pretty fun. While it doesn't actually parse syntax yet, it does let
you do this:
//
11 matches
Mail list logo
