On 29 March 2011 11:06, john skaller wrote:
>
> On 29/03/2011, at 4:28 AM, Rhythmic Fistman wrote:
>>
>> How would I write that if statement?
>>
>> I tried
>> if(1 == 1) then {
>> ...
>> } else {} endif;
>>
>> and it got confused.
>>
>> I used 1 == 1 because I don't know what true is called.
>
> O
On 29/03/2011, at 4:28 AM, Rhythmic Fistman wrote:
>
> How would I write that if statement?
>
> I tried
> if(1 == 1) then {
> ...
> } else {} endif;
>
> and it got confused.
>
> I used 1 == 1 because I don't know what true is called.
One can always look at the library code for hints :)
A fun
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Rhythmic Fistman wrote:
>
> How would I write that if statement?
>
> I tried
> if(1 == 1) then {
> ...
> } else {} endif;
>
> and it got confused.
>
> I used 1 == 1 because I don't know what true is called. And also
> because Java errors if your constant boolean e
On 28 March 2011 19:14, john skaller wrote:
>
> On 29/03/2011, at 3:27 AM, Rhythmic Fistman wrote:
>
>> Still porting old felix to new - now the compiler is objecting to
>>
>> #if true
>>
>> #else
>>
>> #endif
>>
>> What should I do? I could use a real if statement
>
>
> Yes. There's no preprocess
On 29/03/2011, at 3:27 AM, Rhythmic Fistman wrote:
> Still porting old felix to new - now the compiler is objecting to
>
> #if true
>
> #else
>
> #endif
>
> What should I do? I could use a real if statement
Yes. There's no preprocessor now. There are also no macros
except for
macro val x =
Still porting old felix to new - now the compiler is objecting to
#if true
#else
#endif
What should I do? I could use a real if statement or just take the plunge and
expunge that unused code.
RF
--
Create and publish
