IT DOES NOT SOUND LOGICAL TO ME. EITHER YOU ARE POSITIVE OR NOT.
Kelley S wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Long ago I learned from this list, there is no such thing as light positive
> reading. It indicates an error with the test. I don't have documentation
> to back this up, can anyone help?
__
THERE IS SOMETHING ABOUT THAT NAME "HARLEY". I HAVE ONE. HE THINKS HE IS KING
OF THE HILL, HIS DOES NOT STICK SO NO NEED TO COVER (SISTER DEE DOES IT FOR
HIM).
Maya D'Alessio wrote:
> Good luck! We just brought a new cat home to keep merlot company since
> yang died of felv in June. We
POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE, I WILL TAKE THEM. MY VET SAID THAT AS LONG AS THE OTHERS
ARE VACCINATED, IT IS OKAY TO MIX. I HAVE BEEN FOR MANY YEARS NOW AND NEVER
HAD A NEGATIVE BECOME POSITIVE.
Kimber wrote:
> A loophole
>
> There's a loophole that some fortunate kittens are able to slip thr
>From a scientific standpoint, it is logical. It means that there is low
amounts of antigen in the blood, but it is present.
Some of the older tests used to only test for antibodies, well a cat that
has been vaccinated, or exposed ever, is going to have antibodies.
The SNAPP test looks for the a
I HAVE HAD ANNIE FOR OVER 8 YEARS NOW. SHE IS STILL HEALTHYAND CONTRARY AS
EVER. SHE WAS AN ONLY CAT FOR THE FIRST 4 YEARS AND THEN HER OWNER BECAMSE
VERY ILL AND WAS IN HOSPICE SO SHE BEGAN LOOKING FOR A HOME THAT WOULD SPOIL
HER LIKE SHE HAD. ANNIT SPENT MOST OF HER DAYS ON HER BED. NOW, S
5 matches
Mail list logo
