On 18-Jun-2001, Simon Peyton-Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> | IMHO, this is not a very attractive solution. I'd prefer to
> | complicate the ccall entity description slightly and go for
> |
> | foreign import ccall "myheader.h foo@mylib" foo :: Int -> Int
> |
> | Ie, we optionally a
| IMHO, this is not a very attractive solution. I'd prefer to
| complicate the ccall entity description slightly and go for
|
| foreign import ccall "myheader.h foo@mylib" foo :: Int -> Int
|
| Ie, we optionally allow the specification of the name of a
| dll. This is only a hint and ma
Manuel wrote:
> [...] I'd prefer to complicate the ccall entity description
> slightly and go for
>
> foreign import ccall "myheader.h foo@mylib" foo :: Int -> Int
>
> [...] Any objections?
I'd favour this, too. Just a very minor note: If there is a "::"-syntax
for this already on .NET,
