For the record, I am strongly in favor of Haskell finalizers, if a
Mutable State extension were to be written, then it will have to
address the issue with one of the solutions mentioned in this
thread,
We already have a perfectly good Mutable State extension. We know
exactly what it looks
On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 06:03:07PM +0100, Alastair Reid wrote:
For the record, I am strongly in favor of Haskell finalizers, if a
Mutable State extension were to be written, then it will have to
address the issue with one of the solutions mentioned in this
thread,
We already have a
For the record, I am strongly in favor of Haskell finalizers, if a
Mutable State extension were to be written, then it will have to address
the issue with one of the solutions mentioned in this thread, but among
other things, not having haskell finalizers seems to imply that we would
need to add
