RE: FFI Addendum, CVS Id 1.19

2001-10-31 Thread Simon Marlow
> A revised version of the FFI Addendum including all issues > of the last discussion is now available from Look good... > New stuff to check > ~~ > * Section 5.10: Extended handling of IOError (slight variant > of SimonM's proposal) This is fine for now. The slight lopsidedn

Re: FFI Addendum, CVS Id 1.19

2001-11-02 Thread Sven Panne
[ This mail answers Andre's last question in the HOpenGL mailing list, so I'll cross-post... ] The addendum looks fine for me, well done Manuel! But as usual, I've got a few minor points: * Section 3.4 (export declarations) says: "If an evaluation triggered by an external invocatio

RE: FFI Addendum, CVS Id 1.19

2002-01-10 Thread Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
"Simon Marlow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, > > New stuff to check > > ~~ > > * Section 5.10: Extended handling of IOError (slight variant > > of SimonM's proposal) > > This is fine for now. The slight lopsidedness of the IOError design is > still bothering me though: there's no

Re: [HOpenGL] Re: FFI Addendum, CVS Id 1.19

2002-01-10 Thread Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
Sven Panne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, > The addendum looks fine for me, well done Manuel! But as usual, I've got a few > minor points: > >* Section 3.4 (export declarations) says: > > "If an evaluation triggered by an external invocation of an exported > Haskell value retur