Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter/vf_xcam: add xcam video filter

2020-07-31 Thread Zong, Wei
> -Original Message- > From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Steven > Liu > Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2020 7:04 PM > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter/vf_xcam: add xcam video filter > > Zong, Wei 于2020年7月30日周四 下午6:00写道: > > > > Some

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter/vf_xcam: add xcam video filter

2020-07-31 Thread zongwave
From: Yinhang Liu xcam filter is a wrapper of libxcam project which supports 360 video stitching, automotive surround view stitching, digital video stabilization (DVS), wavelet noise reduction, 3D noise reduction, etc. libxcam library optimized algorithms by AVX, GLES and Vulkan depends on hardw

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Pull Request - Support Windows Subsystem for Linux

2020-07-31 Thread Julio César Rocha
I didn't find any documentation that refers to building with WSL. Can builds with WSL be achieved without any patching? Also, how should I split the patch, if it's only modifying one file? On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:52 PM Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > > > > Am 31.07.2020 um 06:59 schrieb Julio Césa

[FFmpeg-devel] [v3] dnn_backend_native_layer_mathunary: add ceil_v2 support

2020-07-31 Thread Mingyu Yin
It can be tested with the model generated with below python script: import tensorflow as tf import os import numpy as np import imageio from tensorflow.python.framework import graph_util name = 'ceil' pb_file_path = os.getcwd() if not os.path.exists(pb_file_path+'/{}_savemodel/'.format(name)):

[FFmpeg-devel] [v4] dnn_backend_native_layer_mathunary: add ceil support

2020-07-31 Thread Mingyu Yin
It can be tested with the model generated with below python script: import tensorflow as tf import os import numpy as np import imageio from tensorflow.python.framework import graph_util name = 'ceil' pb_file_path = os.getcwd() if not os.path.exists(pb_file_path+'/{}_savemodel/'.format(name)):

[FFmpeg-devel] Building with WSL instead of MSYS?

2020-07-31 Thread Julio César Rocha
Hi. I recently submitted a patch to enable building the Windows flavor with Windows Subsystem for Linux as an alternative to MSYS / CYGWIN. I got the feedback that people are already able to achieve this. Has anyone achieved this without patching the sources (out of the box)? If so, could you ple

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] cineform CFHD encoder, and decoder speedup

2020-07-31 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 7/30/20, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote: > Paul B Mahol: >> >> +static int cfhd_encode_frame(AVCodecContext *avctx, AVPacket *pkt, >> + const AVFrame *frame, int *got_packet) >> +{ >> +CFHDEncContext *s = avctx->priv_data; >> +PutByteContext *pby = &s->pby; >> +

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] cineform CFHD encoder, and decoder speedup

2020-07-31 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 7/30/20, James Almer wrote: > On 7/30/2020 1:32 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: >> Hi, >> >> patches attached. >> >> Decoder speedup is approx %20 overall. > >> From 9692daafc0c4a69ce3cf7dca5b5aa90b5737e15f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Paul B Mahol >> Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 18:18:18 +0200 >> Subj

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] cineform CFHD encoder, and decoder speedup

2020-07-31 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 7/30/20, Nicolas George wrote: > Paul B Mahol (12020-07-30): >> Hi, >> >> patches attached. >> >> Decoder speedup is approx %20 overall. > >> From 9692daafc0c4a69ce3cf7dca5b5aa90b5737e15f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Paul B Mahol >> Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 18:18:18 +0200 >> Subject: [PATCH

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter/vf_xcam: add xcam video filter

2020-07-31 Thread Zong, Wei
Thank you for the comments on this patch, I want to make some explanation on your comments. 1. the purpose of this patch We got some requirements from users who are trying libxcam stitching or developers who showing interests. Many of them want an easy way to construct an end 2 end pipelin

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter/vf_xcam: add xcam video filter

2020-07-31 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 7/31/20, Zong, Wei wrote: > Thank you for the comments on this patch, I want to make some explanation on > your comments. > > 1. the purpose of this patch > We got some requirements from users who are trying libxcam stitching or > developers who showing interests. Many of them want an easy

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] cineform CFHD encoder, and decoder speedup

2020-07-31 Thread Nicolas George
Paul B Mahol (12020-07-31): > These are either made up by inspecting numbers from already encoded > files or added new ones from scratch. "Document" means in the source code. And I meant all the numbers, including codebook and runbook, not just quantization_per_subband. -- Nicolas George sig

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Pull Request - Support Windows Subsystem for Linux

2020-07-31 Thread zhilizhao
> On Jul 31, 2020, at 3:19 PM, Julio César Rocha wrote: > > I didn't find any documentation that refers to building with WSL. > Can builds with WSL be achieved without any patching? > > Also, how should I split the patch, if it's only modifying one file? Modify a part of the file, git add &&

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] cineform CFHD additions and improvements

2020-07-31 Thread Paul B Mahol
Hi, updated patches attached. This work is sponsored by VideoLAN. 0001-avcodec-add-CFHD-encoder.patch Description: Binary data 0002-avcodec-cfhd-move-if-else-out-of-loop-in-inverse-tra.patch Description: Binary data 0003-avcodec-cfhd-fix-non-aligned-to-8-height-decoding.patch Description: B

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] cineform CFHD additions and improvements

2020-07-31 Thread Nicolas George
Paul B Mahol (12020-07-31): > From 6ec6fb33ac4a21c602b44efa94ff3246a6ea4342 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Paul B Mahol > Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 18:18:18 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH 1/3] avcodec: add CFHD encoder > > --- > libavcodec/Makefile| 1 + > libavcodec/allcodecs.c | 1 + > libavco

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] cineform CFHD encoder, and decoder speedup

2020-07-31 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 7/31/20, Nicolas George wrote: > Paul B Mahol (12020-07-31): >> These are either made up by inspecting numbers from already encoded >> files or added new ones from scratch. > > "Document" means in the source code. And I meant all the numbers, > including codebook and runbook, not just quantizat

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] cineform CFHD additions and improvements

2020-07-31 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 7/31/20, Nicolas George wrote: > Paul B Mahol (12020-07-31): >> From 6ec6fb33ac4a21c602b44efa94ff3246a6ea4342 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Paul B Mahol >> Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 18:18:18 +0200 >> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] avcodec: add CFHD encoder >> >> --- >> libavcodec/Makefile| 1 + >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] cineform CFHD additions and improvements

2020-07-31 Thread Nicolas George
Paul B Mahol (12020-07-31): > Disagree, no it does not, also only you complained about it. Do not push this patch unless the origin of all these numbers is properly documented in the source code. I am ready to argue, but I will not spend more text than you on it. -- Nicolas George signature

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] cineform CFHD additions and improvements

2020-07-31 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 7/31/20, Nicolas George wrote: > Paul B Mahol (12020-07-31): >> Disagree, no it does not, also only you complained about it. > > Do not push this patch unless the origin of all these numbers is > properly documented in the source code. > > I am ready to argue, but I will not spend more text tha

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] cineform CFHD additions and improvements

2020-07-31 Thread Nicolas George
Paul B Mahol (12020-07-31): > Always when you appear you must evoke your request that must be > fulfilled at any costs no matter how useless they are. I will not answer this personal attack. > No existing encoder/decoder document their tables and how they got it, > unless they are part of existin

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter/vf_xcam: add xcam video filter

2020-07-31 Thread Zong, Wei
> -Original Message- > From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Paul B > Mahol > Sent: Friday, July 31, 2020 3:57 PM > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches > Cc: Liu, YinhangX > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter/vf_xcam: add xcam video filter > > On 7/31/20, Zong, Wei wro

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Pull Request - Support Windows Subsystem for Linux

2020-07-31 Thread Julio César Rocha
Understood, thanks! Here are the updated patches. On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 1:07 AM zhilizhao wrote: > > > > On Jul 31, 2020, at 3:19 PM, Julio César Rocha > wrote: > > > > I didn't find any documentation that refers to building with WSL. > > Can builds with WSL be achieved without any patching?

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] cineform CFHD additions and improvements

2020-07-31 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 7/31/20, Nicolas George wrote: > Paul B Mahol (12020-07-31): >> Always when you appear you must evoke your request that must be >> fulfilled at any costs no matter how useless they are. > > I will not answer this personal attack. You think this is some kind of game, that you will reply only if

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter/vf_xcam: add xcam video filter

2020-07-31 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 7/31/20, Zong, Wei wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Paul B >> Mahol >> Sent: Friday, July 31, 2020 3:57 PM >> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches >> Cc: Liu, YinhangX >> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter/vf_xcam: add xcam video

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] cineform CFHD additions and improvements

2020-07-31 Thread Nicolas George
Paul B Mahol (12020-07-31): > As already said they are derived from other parts of code or by research, > there is no original source that could be used and written as link in > source code. > > For reverse engineered codecs documenting from which binary blob it > came from is nonsense. I do not

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] doc/developer: origin of tables should be documented.

2020-07-31 Thread Nicolas George
Tables that were not just written by the code author are not actually source code, otherwise, "recode data..x1 < proprietary.o > source.c" would be enough to launder a proprietary blob into the source code. Documenting the origin of the tables or the methods for their generation is necessary to le

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] doc/developer: origin of tables should be documented.

2020-07-31 Thread Nicolas George
Lynne (12020-07-31): > I disagree. We don't have any proprietary blobs in our codebase. > Everything that you think is binary is in fact a well defined VLC > table that simply describes bit positions and lengths. Please read my message more carefully (and possibly with less hostility): I never sai

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2] avformat/mxfdec: Read color metadata from MXF

2020-07-31 Thread Harry Mallon
Hi, V2 fixes all the fate tests (I didn't know to download the test footage before. Doh). The following patch adds reading colour metadata (transfer, primaries and colour space) from standard MXF files. I wrote it without seeing the other patch but it turned out very similar to this one that w

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter/vf_xcam: add xcam video filter

2020-07-31 Thread 赵娟
The xcam filter is providing high quality stitching, accepting data from the current 360 camera, one example is: https://www.insta360.com/product/insta360-pro2/. Now the current 360 camera output doesn't provide a broad pixel format, only YUV420P and NV12. (For other formats, we can use current FFm

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] avcodec/put_bits: Make skip_put_bits() less dangerous

2020-07-31 Thread Andreas Rheinhardt
Before c63c303a1f2b58677d480505ec93a90f77dd25b5 (the commit which introduced a typedef for the type of the buffer of a PutBitContext) skip_put_bits() was as follows: static inline void skip_put_bits(PutBitContext *s, int n) { s->bit_left -= n; s->buf_ptr -= 4 * (s->bit_left >> 5); s->

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/2] avcodec/g723_1enc: Avoid skip_put_bits()

2020-07-31 Thread Andreas Rheinhardt
If a bit is reserved, it matters very much what value it has, because otherwise a decoder conforming to a future version of the standard might interpret the output file in an unintended manner. This implies that one must not use skip_put_bits() for it (which does not give any guarantees wrt what en

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Building with WSL instead of MSYS?

2020-07-31 Thread Timo Rothenpieler
On 31.07.2020 09:41, Julio César Rocha wrote: Hi. I recently submitted a patch to enable building the Windows flavor with Windows Subsystem for Linux as an alternative to MSYS / CYGWIN. I got the feedback that people are already able to achieve this. Has anyone achieved this without patching th

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Building with WSL instead of MSYS?

2020-07-31 Thread Julio César Rocha
Do you use the MSVC compilers? If so, how do you get around compiling linux-type absolute paths with cl.exe? (i.e. /home/user/src/ffmpeg/dir/file.c). Microsoft's CL.EXE does not accept paths beginning with a forward slash. On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 4:02 AM Timo Rothenpieler wrote: > On 31.07.2020

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/8] avcodec/smacker: Remove write-only and unused variables

2020-07-31 Thread Andreas Rheinhardt
Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt --- libavcodec/smacker.c | 8 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/libavcodec/smacker.c b/libavcodec/smacker.c index 9f054f071d..e53183318e 100644 --- a/libavcodec/smacker.c +++ b/libavcodec/smacker.c @@ -59,7 +59,6 @@ typedef struct SmackVContex

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/8] avcodec/smacker: Don't warn for Huffmann tables with one element

2020-07-31 Thread Andreas Rheinhardt
The Huffmann tables used by Smacker can consist of exactly one leaf only in which case the length of the corresponding code is zero; there is then exactly one value encoded. Our VLC can't handle this and therefore this case needs to be treated separately; it has been implemented in commit 48cbdaea1

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 5/8] avcodec/smacker: Improve header table error checks

2020-07-31 Thread Andreas Rheinhardt
The extradata for Smacker video contains Huffman trees as well as a field containing the size (in bytes) of said Huffman tree when stored as a table. Due to three special values the decoder allocates more than the size field indicates; yet when it parses the table it only errors out if the number o

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 4/8] avcodec/smacker: Remove code duplication when decoding header trees

2020-07-31 Thread Andreas Rheinhardt
Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt --- libavcodec/smacker.c | 83 +++- 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-) diff --git a/libavcodec/smacker.c b/libavcodec/smacker.c index 3c9f118fb7..b6245a0ce1 100644 --- a/libavcodec/smacker.c +++ b/libavcodec

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 3/8] avcodec/vlc: Add macro for ff_init_vlc_sparse()

2020-07-31 Thread Andreas Rheinhardt
ff_init_vlc_sparse() supports arrays of uint8_t, uint16_t and uint32_t as input (and it also supports padding/other elements in between the elements). This makes the typical case in which the input is a simple array more cumbersome. E.g. for an array of uint8_t one would either need to call the fun

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 6/8] avcodec/smacker: Directly goto error in case of error

2020-07-31 Thread Andreas Rheinhardt
Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt --- libavcodec/smacker.c | 7 --- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/libavcodec/smacker.c b/libavcodec/smacker.c index 8a4d88cfed..4b1f0f1b7c 100644 --- a/libavcodec/smacker.c +++ b/libavcodec/smacker.c @@ -251,17 +251,18 @@ static

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 7/8] avcodec/smacker: Use same variable for return values and errors

2020-07-31 Thread Andreas Rheinhardt
smacker_decode_header_tree() uses different variables for return values (res) and for errors (err) leading to code like res = foo(bar); if (res < 0) { err = res; goto error; } Given that no positive return value is ever used at all one can simplify the above by removing the intermediate res

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 8/8] avcodec/smacker: Forward error codes

2020-07-31 Thread Andreas Rheinhardt
Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt --- libavcodec/smacker.c | 9 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/libavcodec/smacker.c b/libavcodec/smacker.c index 07fa8887d8..9ba70af6f7 100644 --- a/libavcodec/smacker.c +++ b/libavcodec/smacker.c @@ -653,18 +653,15 @@ stati

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Building with WSL instead of MSYS?

2020-07-31 Thread Timo Rothenpieler
On 31.07.2020 13:17, Julio César Rocha wrote: Do you use the MSVC compilers? If so, how do you get around compiling linux-type absolute paths with cl.exe? (i.e. /home/user/src/ffmpeg/dir/file.c). Microsoft's CL.EXE does not accept paths beginning with a forward slash. I don't, why would I? I j

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avformat/flvdec: Remove unnecessary initializations

2020-07-31 Thread zhilizhao
Please help review the patch, thanks! > On Jul 26, 2020, at 1:30 PM, Zhao Zhili wrote: > > pre_tag_size is always reset by avio_rb32(). For AVFormatContext > start_time, as the document says, "NEVER set this value directly: > It is deduced from the AVStream values." > --- > fix commit subject >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Project orientation

2020-07-31 Thread 赵娟
On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 5:26 AM Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: > On Sat, Jul 4, 2020, at 19:44, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > Another area as we are already on the subject is stuff falling a little > > outside what FFmpeg covers. > > Not every filter that anyone wants to write should have to be in FF

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Building with WSL instead of MSYS?

2020-07-31 Thread Julio César Rocha
You would, if you had to or wanted to use the Microsoft compilers, as in my case. So, in summary, your use case is different to what I’m trying to do. On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 04:26 Timo Rothenpieler wrote: > On 31.07.2020 13:17, Julio César Rocha wrote: > > Do you use the MSVC compilers? > > If

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] doc/developer: origin of tables should be documented.

2020-07-31 Thread Lynne
Jul 31, 2020, 10:48 by geo...@nsup.org: > Tables that were not just written by the code author are > not actually source code, otherwise, > "recode data..x1 < proprietary.o > source.c" > would be enough to launder a proprietary blob into > the source code. > > Documenting the origin of the tables

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Building with WSL instead of MSYS?

2020-07-31 Thread Jaka Bac
On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 at 13:26, Timo Rothenpieler wrote: > On 31.07.2020 13:17, Julio César Rocha wrote: > > Do you use the MSVC compilers? > > If so, how do you get around compiling linux-type absolute paths with > > cl.exe? (i.e. /home/user/src/ffmpeg/dir/file.c). > > Microsoft's CL.EXE does not

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] doc/developer: origin of tables should be documented.

2020-07-31 Thread Kieran Kunhya
> /* Geometric progression with ratio 42. */ > > Or, if you used a one-liner in whatever language of your choice, just > copy-paste it into the comment: > > /* Zsh: for i in {0..11}; printf "%8x\\n" $[440*2**(22+i/12.)] */ > This is completely unrealistic for reverse engineered tables such as VLCs

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Building with WSL instead of MSYS?

2020-07-31 Thread Timo Rothenpieler
On 31.07.2020 14:11, Julio César Rocha wrote: You would, if you had to or wanted to use the Microsoft compilers, as in my case. Just tested with msvc in WSL(i.e. launch wsl.exe from within a x64 native tools cmd), and it works just fine as well without any modifications made. ___

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] doc/developer: origin of tables should be documented.

2020-07-31 Thread Nicolas George
Kieran Kunhya (12020-07-31): > > /* Geometric progression with ratio 42. */ > > > > Or, if you used a one-liner in whatever language of your choice, just > > copy-paste it into the comment: > > > > /* Zsh: for i in {0..11}; printf "%8x\\n" $[440*2**(22+i/12.)] */ > > This is completely unrealistic

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2] avformat/mxfdec: Read color metadata from MXF

2020-07-31 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 7/31/20, Harry Mallon wrote: > Hi, > > V2 fixes all the fate tests (I didn't know to download the test footage > before. Doh). > > The following patch adds reading colour metadata (transfer, primaries and > colour space) from > standard MXF files. I wrote it without seeing the other patch but i

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/8] avcodec/smacker: Remove write-only and unused variables

2020-07-31 Thread Paul B Mahol
probably ok On 7/31/20, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote: > Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt > --- > libavcodec/smacker.c | 8 > 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/libavcodec/smacker.c b/libavcodec/smacker.c > index 9f054f071d..e53183318e 100644 > --- a/libavcodec/smacker.c > +++

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavc/ratecontrol: Fix error logging for parsing and evaluation of rc_eq

2020-07-31 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 02:42:30PM +0200, Alexander Strasser wrote: > Don't pass a potential NULL pointer to av_log, instead use a default > in the rc_eq AVOption definitions. Now the context variable always > holds a string; even if it's the default expression. > > Note this also fixes the evalua

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [aarch64] improve hscale by 50% with multi-threading

2020-07-31 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 01:32:47AM -0500, Sebastian Pop wrote: > On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 1:35 AM Michael Niedermayer > wrote: > > > Multithreading support should be added in a architecture independant way > > > > > Attached patch moves helper threads up from hscale to > chr_h_scale and lum_h_scal

[FFmpeg-devel] RTSP - Increasing the buffer size of control URI to 2048 chars

2020-07-31 Thread Yeet
Attached patch increases the max length of control URI to 2048 characters, as urls of some RTSP streams do exceed this limit. 0001-Increasing-the-max-length-of-control-URI-to-2048-cha.patch Description: Binary data ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-d

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avutil/opt: Restore NULL input handling to set_string_video_rate()

2020-07-31 Thread Jack Haughton
Commit a500b975 removed NULL input handling from this function, moving the check higher up the call tree in one branch. However, there is another call to set_string_video_rate() which may pass NULL, and future users of the function may not be clear that a NULL check is required. This patch restores

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avutil/opt: Restore NULL input handling to set_string_video_rate()

2020-07-31 Thread Michael Niedermayer
Hi On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 03:53:56PM +0100, Jack Haughton wrote: > Commit a500b975 removed NULL input handling from this function, > moving the check higher up the call tree in one branch. However, > there is another call to set_string_video_rate() which may pass > NULL, and future users of the f

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/2] avcodec/g723_1enc: Avoid skip_put_bits()

2020-07-31 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 12:39:46PM +0200, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote: > If a bit is reserved, it matters very much what value it has, because > otherwise a decoder conforming to a future version of the standard might > interpret the output file in an unintended manner. This implies that > one must no

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] libsvtav1: Rename without a -

2020-07-31 Thread Mark Thompson
On 31/07/2020 00:59, James Almer wrote: On 7/30/2020 6:31 PM, Mark Thompson wrote: The external library is called libsvtav1, so use this name everywhere. --- configure| 2 +- libavcodec/Makefile | 2 +- libavcodec/allcodecs.c

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] avformat/dv: allow returning damaged audio

2020-07-31 Thread Michael Niedermayer
Fixes: Ticket8762 Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer --- libavformat/dv.c | 49 +--- 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/libavformat/dv.c b/libavformat/dv.c index e99422d4b5..7ebe1815b3 100644 --- a/libavformat/dv.c +++ b/liba

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/2] avformat/dv: Change default dvaudio_concealment to PASS

2020-07-31 Thread Michael Niedermayer
With this change the AV sync issues should be fixed without manually setting the dvaudio_concealment Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer --- libavformat/dv.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/libavformat/dv.c b/libavformat/dv.c index 7ebe1815b3..aea68d40fc 100644

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Pull Request - Support Windows Subsystem for Linux

2020-07-31 Thread Julio César Rocha
Friendly ping. Are these changes acceptable now? On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 1:35 AM Julio César Rocha wrote: > Understood, thanks! > > Here are the updated patches. > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 1:07 AM zhilizhao wrote: > >> >> >> > On Jul 31, 2020, at 3:19 PM, Julio César Rocha >> wrote: >> > >>