Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/3] libswscale: add support for VUYX format

2022-08-19 Thread James Almer
On 8/19/2022 10:24 PM, Philip Langdale wrote: As we already have support for VUYA, I figured I should do the small amount of work to support VUYX as well. That means a little refactoring to share code. Signed-off-by: Philip Langdale --- libswscale/input.c | 10 ---

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2 1/7] avutil: move half-precision float helper to avutil

2022-08-19 Thread Timo Rothenpieler
On 18.08.2022 17:37, Timo Rothenpieler wrote: I plan to push this soon. The half2float.o entry has been moved to the correct Makefile, otherwise nothing else changed in the meantime. applied ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/2] avcodec/mpeg4videodec: Keep data_partitioning in sync between threads

2022-08-19 Thread Andreas Rheinhardt
Andreas Rheinhardt: > Fixes frame-threaded decoding of samples created by concatting > a video with data partitioning and a video not using it. > (Only the MPEG-4 decoder sets this, so it is synced in > mpeg4_update_thread_context() despite being a MpegEncContext-field.) > > Signed-off-by:

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] API enhancements / broken promises

2022-08-19 Thread Timo Rothenpieler
On 19.08.2022 20:30, Michael Niedermayer wrote: ok but just to clarify what i meant / was thinking of was a simple key / value style parser no features beyond that. just enough so we can use it to read our own generated xml from some object serialization. One can hardly call that XML then. For

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] API enhancements / broken promises

2022-08-19 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 07:19:07PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: > On Wed, 17 Aug 2022, at 19:21, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > a unwise choice. But if someone is against very basic xml or json parsers > > please speak up now and here because its still better to say "no" now than > > after

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v3] mov: Compare frag times in correct time base when seeking a stream without a corresponding sidx

2022-08-19 Thread Derek Buitenhuis
On 8/17/2022 11:29 AM, Zhao Zhili wrote: >> This seems like it should be in a separate patch, though - it is >> changing a different >> behavior than what this patch does. > > OK. Will send a 2nd patch with this in the next few days. >> I did look at that, but I do not think it can be. >> >>

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] doc/plans: add a file to list approved projects

2022-08-19 Thread Jean-Baptiste Kempf
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022, at 18:01, Nicolas George wrote: > Or I might be hit by a bus. Or I might decide to try heroin and overdose > because it was cut with fentanyl. Or… If we always focus on the Exactly. This is called the bus-factor and is important in all volunteers open source communities.

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] doc/plans: add a file to list approved projects

2022-08-19 Thread Nicolas George
Jean-Baptiste Kempf (12022-08-18): > Those plans files become outdated very quickly and are often not maintained. > Or they become infinite unicorn-wishlist things. > Or they become a blocking task for the project. Or I might be hit by a bus. Or I might decide to try heroin and overdose because

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2] avcodec/audiotoolboxenc: return external error if encode failed

2022-08-19 Thread James Almer
On 6/24/2022 4:05 AM, Steven Liu wrote: "zhilizhao(赵志立)" 于2022年6月24日周五 14:59写道: On Jun 24, 2022, at 1:59 PM, Steven Liu wrote: because the AudioConverterFillComplexBuffer can return 0 or 1 if success. so set the ret to 0 it AudioConverterFillComplexBuffer success and return ret value for

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] ipfsgateway: Remove default gateway

2022-08-19 Thread Mark Gaiser
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 11:15 AM Tomas Härdin wrote: > tor 2022-08-18 klockan 16:31 +0200 skrev Michael Niedermayer: > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 05:03:56PM +0200, Tomas Härdin wrote: > > > tor 2022-08-11 klockan 19:35 +0200 skrev Timo Rothenpieler: > > > > On 11.08.2022 19:21, Mark Gaiser wrote:

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] sws: Don't compile yuv2yuvX for mmx

2022-08-19 Thread Alan Kelly
Thanks for doing this! On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 10:53 AM Andreas Rheinhardt < andreas.rheinha...@outlook.com> wrote: > Alan Kelly: > > --- > > libswscale/x86/yuv2yuvX.asm | 2 -- > > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/libswscale/x86/yuv2yuvX.asm b/libswscale/x86/yuv2yuvX.asm > >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2] checkasm: sw_scale: Produce more realistic test filter coefficients for yuv2yuvX

2022-08-19 Thread Martin Storsjö
On Thu, 18 Aug 2022, Alan Kelly wrote: Thanks Martin for doing this. On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 10:16 AM Martin Storsjö wrote: This avoids triggering overflows in the filters, and avoids stray test failures in the approximate functions on x86; due to rounding

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] ipfsgateway: Remove default gateway

2022-08-19 Thread Tomas Härdin
tor 2022-08-18 klockan 16:31 +0200 skrev Michael Niedermayer: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 05:03:56PM +0200, Tomas Härdin wrote: > > tor 2022-08-11 klockan 19:35 +0200 skrev Timo Rothenpieler: > > > On 11.08.2022 19:21, Mark Gaiser wrote: > > > > > > > > Here's the conversation requesting this very

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] sws: Don't compile yuv2yuvX for mmx

2022-08-19 Thread Andreas Rheinhardt
Alan Kelly: > --- > libswscale/x86/yuv2yuvX.asm | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/libswscale/x86/yuv2yuvX.asm b/libswscale/x86/yuv2yuvX.asm > index b6294cb919..d5b03495fd 100644 > --- a/libswscale/x86/yuv2yuvX.asm > +++ b/libswscale/x86/yuv2yuvX.asm > @@ -124,8 +124,6 @@

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] sws: Don't compile yuv2yuvX for mmx

2022-08-19 Thread Alan Kelly
--- libswscale/x86/yuv2yuvX.asm | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/libswscale/x86/yuv2yuvX.asm b/libswscale/x86/yuv2yuvX.asm index b6294cb919..d5b03495fd 100644 --- a/libswscale/x86/yuv2yuvX.asm +++ b/libswscale/x86/yuv2yuvX.asm @@ -124,8 +124,6 @@ cglobal yuv2yuvX, 7, 7, 8,

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec/pthread_frame: update the main avctx from the current, ThreadContext

2022-08-19 Thread Steve Lhomme
Hi, On 2022-08-02 16:19, Anton Khirnov wrote: Why are you not resubmitting your original patch that stops copying hwaccel_priv_data to the user-facing context? It seemed more correct to me, since the user-facing context should never see any hwaccel data. Or does it not fix the issue fully?