On Tue, 2022-11-08 at 19:45 +0800, Fei Wang wrote:
> This can fix vp9 decode image corruption when the frame size is change,
> but the pervious frames still be referenced.
>
> Surfaces don't need to be bound to vaContext only after VAAPI 1.0.0:
> https://github.com/intel/libva/commit/492b692005ccd
Ping for review.
> On Oct 24, 2022, at 11:16, Zhao Zhili wrote:
>
> From: Zhao Zhili
>
> Firstly, some bugs were fixed (patch 1-4).
>
> Patch 5 and 6 make mediacodec_wrapper support Java MediaCodec and NDK
> MediaCodec. The use case I'm considering is run FFmpeg on cmdline without JVM,
> for
On Mon, 2022-11-07 at 05:24 +, Xiang, Haihao wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-11-04 at 16:29 +0800, bin.wang-at-intel@ffmpeg.org wrote:
> > From: bwang30
> >
> > This commit enabled assembly code with intel AVX512 VNNI and added unit test
> > for sobel filter
> >
> > sobel_c: 4537
> > sobel_avx512i
Ping
> 2022年10月26日 10:23,1035567...@qq.com 写道:
>
> From: Wang Yaqiang
>
> In some videos, SPS will be stored before VPS in hvcC box,
> parse SPS does not depend on VPS, so the video is expected to be processed
> normally.
> Added "parsed_vps" parameter to indicate whether VPS have been parsed.
applied
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
applied
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Quoting Paul B Mahol (2022-11-10 13:52:52)
> On 11/10/22, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> > Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2022-11-10 13:28:27)
> >> On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 12:25:47PM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> >> > Lavf only supports a very limited approximation of non-blocking
> >> > behavior, so we sho
On 11/10/22, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2022-11-10 13:28:27)
>> On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 12:25:47PM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote:
>> > Lavf only supports a very limited approximation of non-blocking
>> > behavior, so we should not return random EAGAINs to callers unless they
Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2022-11-10 13:28:27)
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 12:25:47PM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> > Lavf only supports a very limited approximation of non-blocking
> > behavior, so we should not return random EAGAINs to callers unless they
> > specifically requested it.
> > ---
>
Am 02.11.22 um 16:07 schrieb Thilo Borgmann:
From: Cosmin Stejerean
Has been removed by mistake in 2003e32f62d94ba75b59d70632c9f2862b383591, readd
it to the switch cases.
Signed-off-by: Thilo Borgmann
---
libavfilter/vf_dnn_processing.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Ping. Pushin
10 matches
Mail list logo