Hi,
Since a couple of days, the daily builds of FFmpeg on armhf appear to fail on
armhf (but not on other archtectures). The relevant part of the build log
appears to be this:
Test checkasm failed. Look at tests/data/fate/checkasm.err for details.
checkasm: using random seed 3250260437
Bus error
What would you recommend to use for the Debian
package? Is it useful to have libpostproc in Debian? (see also the backlog
of this bug).
Please advise.
Thanks
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 08:18:57AM +0200, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> On 05.09.2014, at 03:46, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> > On Thu,
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 08:18:57AM +0200, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
>> On 05.09.2014, at 03:46, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Michael Niedermayer
>> > wrote:
>> >>&
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> At the end of the day, I need a source tarball that contains
>> maintained sources of a stand-alone libpostproc. I don't care too much
>> how it is created, as long as it doesn't result in code-duplication
>> with existing sources in De
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 11:23 AM, wm4 wrote:
> And in general, it's a good idea to move optional libraries out of
> ffmpeg.git. (In fact, ffmpeg.git should be split into several git
> repos, one for each lib.)
That idea seems very interesting to me. If coordinated and implemented
well, it could p
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi Reinhard
>
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 11:33:48PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 08:22:43PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wr
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 08:22:43PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> > On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:06:10PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>> >> H
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:06:10PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> as discussed in IRC, I was trying to minimal-invasively port
>> libpostproc (the Debian source package) to x32¹. I could not
>> test it (for lack of a stand-al
