Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 5/5] lavfi/vf_fps: accept EOF timestamp.

2014-09-08 Thread Nicolas George
Le duodi 12 fructidor, an CCXXII, Carl Eugen Hoyos a écrit : > Ping? I am actively procrastinating this patch series because I am not completely satisfied with it. The whole mechanism is fragile, and only works if all filters in the chain can forward the EOF message. If that was the design from th

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 5/5] lavfi/vf_fps: accept EOF timestamp.

2014-09-08 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
Michael Niedermayer gmx.at> writes: > > Fix trac ticket #2674. > > > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas George nsup.org> > > --- > > libavfilter/vf_fps.c | 33 + > > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > probably ok Should this get pushed? Carl Eugen __

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 5/5] lavfi/vf_fps: accept EOF timestamp.

2014-08-29 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
Michael Niedermayer gmx.at> writes: > > Fix trac ticket #2674. > > libavfilter/vf_fps.c | 33 + > > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > probably ok Ping? (I didn't test myself.) Carl Eugen ___ ffmpe

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 5/5] lavfi/vf_fps: accept EOF timestamp.

2014-08-03 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Sun, Aug 03, 2014 at 03:15:40PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote: > This makes the FPS filter duplicate the last frame to take > its duration into account, exactly like the other ones. > > Fix trac ticket #2674. > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas George > --- > libavfilter/vf_fps.c | 33 +

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 5/5] lavfi/vf_fps: accept EOF timestamp.

2014-08-03 Thread Nicolas George
This makes the FPS filter duplicate the last frame to take its duration into account, exactly like the other ones. Fix trac ticket #2674. Signed-off-by: Nicolas George --- libavfilter/vf_fps.c | 33 + 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) Aded a ref