On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 11:26:04AM +0200, Piotr Bandurski wrote:
> > file attached but i think there is something wrong with the encoder
> > used, the files do not seem to contain enough non zero bits to
> > be able to contain full yuv422 10bit
> > so i am not sure this will resolve this
>
> ok, e
> file attached but i think there is something wrong with the encoder
> used, the files do not seem to contain enough non zero bits to
> be able to contain full yuv422 10bit
> so i am not sure this will resolve this
ok, encoded it to m101 10bit:
https://www.datafilehost.com/d/119d82c3
__
On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 01:15:02AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 08:18:02PM +0200, Piotr Bandurski wrote:
> > > > a 10bit file with some smooth 10bit gradients would make it
> > > > easier to assign the LSBs correctly. The existing file has half of
> > > > them 0
> >
On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 08:18:02PM +0200, Piotr Bandurski wrote:
> > > a 10bit file with some smooth 10bit gradients would make it
> > > easier to assign the LSBs correctly. The existing file has half of
> > > them 0
> >
> > You mean something like this?:
> >
> > http://bennettfeely.com/gradient
On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 10:51:10PM +0200, Piotr Bandurski wrote:
> > a 10bit file with some smooth 10bit gradients would make it
> > easier to assign the LSBs correctly. The existing file has half of
> > them 0
> >
> > [...]
>
> I reencoded this:
>
> https://samples.mplayerhq.hu/V-codecs/v210/v
> a 10bit file with some smooth 10bit gradients would make it
> easier to assign the LSBs correctly. The existing file has half of
> them 0
>
> [...]
I reencoded this:
https://samples.mplayerhq.hu/V-codecs/v210/v210_720p.avi
to M101:
https://www.datafilehost.com/d/98759d14
___
> > a 10bit file with some smooth 10bit gradients would make it
> > easier to assign the LSBs correctly. The existing file has half of
> > them 0
>
> You mean something like this?:
>
> http://bennettfeely.com/gradients/img/gradient_24.png
If not then please point me to something useful and I wi
Dnia 5 maja 2016 19:47 Michael Niedermayer napisał(a):
> On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 12:10:22PM +0200, Piotr Bandurski wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Dnia 3 maja 2016 11:54 Piotr Bandurski napisał(a):
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > >
> > > > as long as we are throwing out questions.
> > > >
>
On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 12:10:22PM +0200, Piotr Bandurski wrote:
>
>
>
> Dnia 3 maja 2016 11:54 Piotr Bandurski napisał(a):
>
>
>
> >
> > > Hi,
> >
> > > as long as we are throwing out questions.
> > >
> > > the m70x stuff is similar to m10x . and uses same binary codec:
> > >
> > > VIDC
Dnia 3 maja 2016 11:54 Piotr Bandurski napisał(a):
>
> > Hi,
>
> > as long as we are throwing out questions.
> >
> > the m70x stuff is similar to m10x . and uses same binary codec:
> >
> > VIDC.M101=mvcVfw.dll VFW M101 Matrox Uncompressed SD
> > VIDC.m102=mvcVfwHD.dll Matrox Uncompresse
Hi,
> as long as we are throwing out questions.
>
> the m70x stuff is similar to m10x . and uses same binary codec:
>
> VIDC.M101=mvcVfw.dll VFW M101 Matrox Uncompressed SD
> VIDC.m102=mvcVfwHD.dll Matrox Uncompressed HD
> VIDC.m103=mvcVfwYUVA.dll Matrox Uncompressed SD + Alpha
> VIDC.m104=mvcV
On Mon, 02 May 2016 18:50:18 +0200
Piotr Bandurski wrote:
> > > > > VIDC.m702=digivcap.dll Matrox Offline HD
> >
> > It looks like I managed to create samples for this:
> >
> >
> > but the problem is that there are some errors while decoding
> > "m702_2.avi".
> >
> > https://www.datafilehost.
On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 06:50:18PM +0200, Piotr Bandurski wrote:
> > > > > VIDC.m702=digivcap.dll Matrox Offline HD
> >
> > It looks like I managed to create samples for this:
> >
> > "This codec renders video to a proxy HD video format for video editing
> > purposes.
> >
> > Resolutions suppor
> > > > VIDC.m702=digivcap.dll Matrox Offline HD
>
> It looks like I managed to create samples for this:
>
> "This codec renders video to a proxy HD video format for video editing
> purposes.
>
> Resolutions supported: 320x180 for 720p projects, and 480x270 for 1080i/p
> projects"
>
> but the
> > VIDC.m702=digivcap.dll Matrox Offline HD
It looks like I managed to create samples for this:
"This codec renders video to a proxy HD video format for video editing purposes.
Resolutions supported: 320x180 for 720p projects, and 480x270 for 1080i/p
projects"
but the problem is that there ar
On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 12:16:57AM +0200, Piotr Bandurski wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 17:11:26 +0300
> > Александр Слободенюк wrote:
> >
> > > { AV_CODEC_ID_MPEG2VIDEO, MKTAG('M', '7', '0', '1') },
> > > +{ AV_CODEC_ID_MPEG2VIDEO, MKTAG('M', '7', '0', '3') },
> > > { AV_CODEC
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 17:11:26 +0300
> Александр Слободенюк wrote:
>
> > { AV_CODEC_ID_MPEG2VIDEO, MKTAG('M', '7', '0', '1') },
> > +{ AV_CODEC_ID_MPEG2VIDEO, MKTAG('M', '7', '0', '3') },
> > { AV_CODEC_ID_MPEG2VIDEO, MKTAG('M', '7', '0', '5') },
>
> i wonder if we can add m7
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 17:11:26 +0300
Александр Слободенюк wrote:
> { AV_CODEC_ID_MPEG2VIDEO, MKTAG('M', '7', '0', '1') },
> +{ AV_CODEC_ID_MPEG2VIDEO, MKTAG('M', '7', '0', '3') },
> { AV_CODEC_ID_MPEG2VIDEO, MKTAG('M', '7', '0', '5') },
i wonder if we can add m702 + m704 as wel
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 05:11:26PM +0300, Александр Слободенюк wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Aleksandr.Slobodeniuk
> ---
> libavformat/riff.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/libavformat/riff.c b/libavformat/riff.c
> index cf5a2ff..7a1f3bc 100644
> --- a/libavformat/riff.c
> ++
Signed-off-by: Aleksandr.Slobodeniuk
---
libavformat/riff.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/libavformat/riff.c b/libavformat/riff.c
index cf5a2ff..7a1f3bc 100644
--- a/libavformat/riff.c
+++ b/libavformat/riff.c
@@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ const AVCodecTag ff_codec_bmp_tags[] = {
20 matches
Mail list logo
