On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:19:36PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> Signed-off-by: James Almer
> ---
> Pros:
> Removes duplicate arrays and ugly c file including c files
>
> Cons:
> Makes the array in libavutil effectively part of the ABI.
> Might not be worth doing for 256 bytes
if iam not mistaken
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Nicolas George wrote:
> James Almer (2017-11-30):
>> Signed-off-by: James Almer
>> ---
>> Pros:
>> Removes duplicate arrays and ugly c file including c files
>>
>> Cons:
>> Makes the array in libavutil effectively part of the ABI.
>> Might not be worth doing for 25
James Almer (2017-11-30):
> Signed-off-by: James Almer
> ---
> Pros:
> Removes duplicate arrays and ugly c file including c files
>
> Cons:
> Makes the array in libavutil effectively part of the ABI.
> Might not be worth doing for 256 bytes
>
>
> Something like this was probably sent before, so
2017-12-01 9:19 GMT+08:00 James Almer :
> Signed-off-by: James Almer
> ---
> Pros:
> Removes duplicate arrays and ugly c file including c files
>
> Cons:
> Makes the array in libavutil effectively part of the ABI.
> Might not be worth doing for 256 bytes
>
>
> Something like this was probably sent
Signed-off-by: James Almer
---
Pros:
Removes duplicate arrays and ugly c file including c files
Cons:
Makes the array in libavutil effectively part of the ABI.
Might not be worth doing for 256 bytes
Something like this was probably sent before, so i guess it
will be rejected again.
libavcodec