On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 01:00:31AM +, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Jan 2017 at 23:43 Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 10:35:43PM +, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have added support for MPEG-4 Sstp using the available samples on trac.
> > > Yes
On Sat, 7 Jan 2017 at 23:43 Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 10:35:43PM +, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have added support for MPEG-4 Sstp using the available samples on trac.
> > Yes it doesn't pass fate, yes it's not format-patch, yes it uses printfs.
> > https
On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 10:35:43PM +, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have added support for MPEG-4 Sstp using the available samples on trac.
> Yes it doesn't pass fate, yes it's not format-patch, yes it uses printfs.
> https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/4447
>
> Being MPEG-4, it depends on mpeg
Hi,
I have added support for MPEG-4 Sstp using the available samples on trac.
Yes it doesn't pass fate, yes it's not format-patch, yes it uses printfs.
https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/4447
Being MPEG-4, it depends on mpegvideo.c so has tons of yuv420p assumptions
baked in which are of course undoc
