On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 03:17:22AM +0200, Peter B. wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I've now cleaned up a few things in the current FFV1 tests:
> - Changed "ffv1.X" to "ffv1-vX", removing necessity for vcodec argument.
> - Added linebreaks to FFV1 FATE tests for better readability.
> - Renamed pix_fmts wording in
Hendrik Leppkes gmail.com> writes:
> What should not be changed is the samples inside the
> FATE suite - if a change is needed, there should be
> a new sample with a new name - which is probably what
> Carl refers to.
Yes.
> But since these seem to be vsynth tests, no external
> samples fro
Am Mo, 31.08.2015, 11:22 schrieb Hendrik Leppkes:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Peter B. wrote:
>>
>> In my case, there are files in "tests/ref/vsynth" that contain the
>> expected reference results from tests.
>>
>> If I only provide the changed the FATE makefiles, like "vcodec.mak", who
>>
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Peter B. wrote:
>
>
> Am Mo, 31.08.2015, 08:31 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos:
>> Peter B. das-werkstatt.com> writes:
>>
>>> Replaced the reference files accordingly
>>
>> This cannot be done, we want to run fate (also)
>> with old sources.
>
> Hm. Now I'm confused...
Am Mo, 31.08.2015, 08:31 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos:
> Peter B. das-werkstatt.com> writes:
>
>> Replaced the reference files accordingly
>
> This cannot be done, we want to run fate (also)
> with old sources.
Hm. Now I'm confused...
I expected old sources to use old tests?
In my case, there are
Peter B. das-werkstatt.com> writes:
> Replaced the reference files accordingly
This cannot be done, we want to run fate (also)
with old sources.
Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmp
Hi.
I've now cleaned up a few things in the current FFV1 tests:
- Changed "ffv1.X" to "ffv1-vX", removing necessity for vcodec argument.
- Added linebreaks to FFV1 FATE tests for better readability.
- Renamed pix_fmts wording in test target name to match pix_fmt parameter.
Replaced the reference
