On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Reimar Döffinger
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 10:50:53PM -0500, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:54 AM, Reimar Döffinger
>> wrote:
>> >> Can you be more specific, and are you sure about this?
>> >
>> > Just run your favourite performance an
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 10:50:53PM -0500, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:54 AM, Reimar Döffinger
> wrote:
> >> Can you be more specific, and are you sure about this?
> >
> > Just run your favourite performance analysis tool and you'll see.
> > As it is non-inlined libc code I
On 08.03.2016, at 04:50, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:54 AM, Reimar Döffinger
> wrote:
>>
>>> Can you be more specific, and are you sure about this?
>>
>> Just run your favourite performance analysis tool and you'll see.
>> As it is non-inlined libc code I'm fairly sure
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:54 AM, Reimar Döffinger
wrote:
> On 07.03.2016, at 04:04, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Reimar Döffinger
>> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 07:35:58PM +0100, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
Approximately 10% faster transcode from mp3 to aac
On 07.03.2016, at 04:04, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Reimar Döffinger
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 07:35:58PM +0100, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
>>> Approximately 10% faster transcode from mp3 to aac
>>> with default settings.
>>
>> Note to anyone wanting to op
On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Reimar Döffinger
wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 07:35:58PM +0100, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
>> Approximately 10% faster transcode from mp3 to aac
>> with default settings.
>
> Note to anyone wanting to optimize it further:
> There is almost 25% on the table if you c
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 04:46:08PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> On 3/6/2016 4:14 PM, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 03:49:00PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> >> On 3/6/2016 3:35 PM, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> >> Are you sure this wasn't vectorized already? I remember i checked and i
On 3/6/2016 4:14 PM, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 03:49:00PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
>> On 3/6/2016 3:35 PM, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
>>> Approximately 10% faster transcode from mp3 to aac
>>> with default settings.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Reimar Döffinger
>>> ---
>>> libavco
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 03:49:00PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> On 3/6/2016 3:35 PM, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> > Approximately 10% faster transcode from mp3 to aac
> > with default settings.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Reimar Döffinger
> > ---
> > libavcodec/aacenc_utils.h | 47
> > ++
On 3/6/2016 3:35 PM, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> Approximately 10% faster transcode from mp3 to aac
> with default settings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Reimar Döffinger
> ---
> libavcodec/aacenc_utils.h | 47
> ++-
> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 9 deletion
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 07:35:58PM +0100, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> Approximately 10% faster transcode from mp3 to aac
> with default settings.
Note to anyone wanting to optimize it further:
There is almost 25% on the table if you can replace
the pow() and cos() function uses by something more
eff
Approximately 10% faster transcode from mp3 to aac
with default settings.
Signed-off-by: Reimar Döffinger
---
libavcodec/aacenc_utils.h | 47 ++-
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavcodec/aacenc_utils.h b/libavcodec/aace
12 matches
Mail list logo