On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Hendrik Leppkes
>> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 4:18 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> > wrote:
>> >> This fixes -Wshift-negativ
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Hendrik Leppkes
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 4:18 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> > wrote:
> >> This fixes -Wshift-negative-value reported with clang 3.7+, e.g
> >>
> http://fate.ffmpeg.org/log.
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 4:18 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
>> This fixes -Wshift-negative-value reported with clang 3.7+, e.g
>> http://fate.ffmpeg.org/log.cgi?time=20150919172459&log=compile&slot=x86_64-darwin-clang-polly-notiling-3.7.
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 4:18 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> This fixes -Wshift-negative-value reported with clang 3.7+, e.g
> http://fate.ffmpeg.org/log.cgi?time=20150919172459&log=compile&slot=x86_64-darwin-clang-polly-notiling-3.7.
> Note that the patch crucially depends on int >= 32 bits,
> an
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 08:08:54AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 4:11 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>> > On 9/25/15, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 10:18 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> >> w
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 08:08:54AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 4:11 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> > On 9/25/15, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> >> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 10:18 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> >> wrote:
> >>> This fixes -Wshift-negative-value reported with clang 3
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 4:11 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On 9/25/15, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 10:18 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> wrote:
>>> This fixes -Wshift-negative-value reported with clang 3.7+, e.g
>>> http://fate.ffmpeg.org/log.cgi?time=20150919172459&log=compile&sl
On 9/25/15, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 10:18 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
>> This fixes -Wshift-negative-value reported with clang 3.7+, e.g
>> http://fate.ffmpeg.org/log.cgi?time=20150919172459&log=compile&slot=x86_64-darwin-clang-polly-notiling-3.7.
>> Note that the
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 10:18 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> This fixes -Wshift-negative-value reported with clang 3.7+, e.g
> http://fate.ffmpeg.org/log.cgi?time=20150919172459&log=compile&slot=x86_64-darwin-clang-polly-notiling-3.7.
> Note that the patch crucially depends on int >= 32 bits,
> a
This fixes -Wshift-negative-value reported with clang 3.7+, e.g
http://fate.ffmpeg.org/log.cgi?time=20150919172459&log=compile&slot=x86_64-darwin-clang-polly-notiling-3.7.
Note that the patch crucially depends on int >= 32 bits,
an assumption made in many places in the codebase.
Signed-off-by: Gan
10 matches
Mail list logo