Michael Niedermayer:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 12:36:08PM +0100, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
>> The earlier version didn't really check that the 'p' of a "p\0" is
>> actually part of a user_data section, instead it treated the first
>> "p\0" after the start of a user_data section as end of a user_dat
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 12:36:08PM +0100, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
> The earlier version didn't really check that the 'p' of a "p\0" is
> actually part of a user_data section, instead it treated the first
> "p\0" after the start of a user_data section as end of a user_data
> section if it is close
The earlier version didn't really check that the 'p' of a "p\0" is
actually part of a user_data section, instead it treated the first
"p\0" after the start of a user_data section as end of a user_data
section if it is close enough to the beginning of the user_data section;
it actually needn't be pa
