On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>> You gonna apply this? or?
>
> I am, later today (pushing with some other stuff).
pushed, thanks.
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-d
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> You gonna apply this? or?
I am, later today (pushing with some other stuff).
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
You gonna apply this? or?
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
On 11/25/15, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> Gain computation for various curves was being done in a needlessly
> inaccurate fashion. Of course these are all subjective curves, but when
> a curve is advertised to the user, it should be matched as closely as
> possible within the limitations of libm. I
Gain computation for various curves was being done in a needlessly
inaccurate fashion. Of course these are all subjective curves, but when
a curve is advertised to the user, it should be matched as closely as
possible within the limitations of libm. In particular, the constants
kept here were prett
